On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:57:34PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 09:03:40 +0100
> Borislav Petkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:23:43AM -0800, Lucy McCoy wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I've been too busy to get to this but i'd rather not use the code
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 09:03:40 +0100
Borislav Petkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:23:43AM -0800, Lucy McCoy wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've been too busy to get to this but i'd rather not use the code fragment
> > i sent Boris to try. It would be better to go ahead with
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:23:43AM -0800, Lucy McCoy wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've been too busy to get to this but i'd rather not use the code fragment
> i sent Boris to try. It would be better to go ahead with the tty setup if
> the pointer is not NULL, otherwise use the defaults and not
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:23:43AM -0800, Lucy McCoy wrote:
Hi All,
I've been too busy to get to this but i'd rather not use the code fragment
i sent Boris to try. It would be better to go ahead with the tty setup if
the pointer is not NULL, otherwise use the defaults and not reference the
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 09:03:40 +0100
Borislav Petkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:23:43AM -0800, Lucy McCoy wrote:
Hi All,
I've been too busy to get to this but i'd rather not use the code fragment
i sent Boris to try. It would be better to go ahead with the tty
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:57:34PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 09:03:40 +0100
Borislav Petkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:23:43AM -0800, Lucy McCoy wrote:
Hi All,
I've been too busy to get to this but i'd rather not use the code
fragment
Hi All,
I've been too busy to get to this but i'd rather not use the code
fragment i sent Boris to try. It would be better to go ahead with the
tty setup if the pointer is not NULL, otherwise use the defaults and not
reference the NULL pointer. I'll see if I can get to this today.
Lucy
Hi All,
I've been too busy to get to this but i'd rather not use the code
fragment i sent Boris to try. It would be better to go ahead with the
tty setup if the pointer is not NULL, otherwise use the defaults and not
reference the NULL pointer. I'll see if I can get to this today.
Lucy
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 02:18:52PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:11:30 +0100
> Borislav Petkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:10:16PM -0800, Lucy McCoy wrote:
...
> > yes, after testing this i can confirm that this one fixes the NULL ptr
> >
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 02:18:52PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:11:30 +0100
Borislav Petkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:10:16PM -0800, Lucy McCoy wrote:
...
yes, after testing this i can confirm that this one fixes the NULL ptr
problem here
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:11:30 +0100
Borislav Petkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:10:16PM -0800, Lucy McCoy wrote:
>
> > static int keyspan_open (struct usb_serial_port *port, struct file *filp)
> > {
> > struct keyspan_port_private *p_priv;
> > struct
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:11:30 +0100
Borislav Petkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:10:16PM -0800, Lucy McCoy wrote:
static int keyspan_open (struct usb_serial_port *port, struct file *filp)
{
struct keyspan_port_private *p_priv;
struct
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:10:16PM -0800, Lucy McCoy wrote:
> static int keyspan_open (struct usb_serial_port *port, struct file *filp)
> {
> struct keyspan_port_private *p_priv;
> struct keyspan_serial_private *s_priv;
> struct usb_serial *serial =
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:10:16PM -0800, Lucy McCoy wrote:
static int keyspan_open (struct usb_serial_port *port, struct file *filp)
{
struct keyspan_port_private *p_priv;
struct keyspan_serial_private *s_priv;
struct usb_serial *serial = port-serial;
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:10:16PM -0800, Lucy McCoy wrote:
Hi Lucy,
> I'm not familiar with the termios stuff on Linux so can you take a look
> at the following modified code to see if this solves your NULL ptr problem?
will test the patch tomorrow and get back to you with results.
> Does
Thursday, November 15, 2007 12:40pm
To: Lucy McCoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] keyspan: init termios properly
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 09:49:22AM -0800, Lucy McCoy wrote:
>
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 09:49:22AM -0800, Lucy McCoy wrote:
> Greg & Boris,
>
> I've been out of town and just saw this.
>
> This patch will work with the 19HS but WILL BREAK all other Keyspan
> adapters. It will take me a few days to get to looking at a correct fix but
> that
Yes, it will break things. I'll try to get to it soon...
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:49:22 -0800 Lucy McCoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greg & Boris,
I've been out of town and just saw this.
This patch will work with the 19HS but WILL BREAK all other Keyspan
adapters. It
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:49:22 -0800 Lucy McCoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg & Boris,
>
> I've been out of town and just saw this.
>
> This patch will work with the 19HS but WILL BREAK all other Keyspan
> adapters. It will take me a few days to get to looking at a correct fix but
> that
Greg & Boris,
I've been out of town and just saw this.
This patch will work with the 19HS but WILL BREAK all other Keyspan
adapters. It will take me a few days to get to looking at a correct fix but
that keyspan_send_setup(port, 1) (and the '1' is the important part)
must happen once
when the
Greg Boris,
I've been out of town and just saw this.
This patch will work with the 19HS but WILL BREAK all other Keyspan
adapters. It will take me a few days to get to looking at a correct fix but
that keyspan_send_setup(port, 1) (and the '1' is the important part)
must happen once
when the
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:49:22 -0800 Lucy McCoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg Boris,
I've been out of town and just saw this.
This patch will work with the 19HS but WILL BREAK all other Keyspan
adapters. It will take me a few days to get to looking at a correct fix but
that
Yes, it will break things. I'll try to get to it soon...
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:49:22 -0800 Lucy McCoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greg Boris,
I've been out of town and just saw this.
This patch will work with the 19HS but WILL BREAK all other Keyspan
adapters. It
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 09:49:22AM -0800, Lucy McCoy wrote:
Greg Boris,
I've been out of town and just saw this.
This patch will work with the 19HS but WILL BREAK all other Keyspan
adapters. It will take me a few days to get to looking at a correct fix but
that keyspan_send_setup(port, 1)
Morton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] keyspan: init termios properly
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 09:49:22AM -0800, Lucy McCoy wrote:
Greg Boris,
I've been out of town and just saw this.
This patch will work with the 19HS but WILL BREAK all other Keyspan
adapters. It will take me a few
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:10:16PM -0800, Lucy McCoy wrote:
Hi Lucy,
I'm not familiar with the termios stuff on Linux so can you take a look
at the following modified code to see if this solves your NULL ptr problem?
will test the patch tomorrow and get back to you with results.
Does cflag
Hi Greg,
i get the following backtrace when booting the kernel with "console=ttyUSB0
console=tty0" while using a Keyspan USA-19HS the usb-to-serial converter
connected to a desktop machine:
[ 43.782384] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbserial
[ 43.782444]
Hi Greg,
i get the following backtrace when booting the kernel with console=ttyUSB0
console=tty0 while using a Keyspan USA-19HS the usb-to-serial converter
connected to a desktop machine:
snip
[ 43.782384] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbserial
[ 43.782444]
28 matches
Mail list logo
