On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 09:10:59AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:37 PM Andrew Morton
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 May 2019 19:15:07 +0200 Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >
> > > From: Dmitry Vyukov
> > >
> > > in_softirq() is a wrong predicate to check if we are in a softirq
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:37 PM Andrew Morton
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 May 2019 19:15:07 +0200 Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
> > From: Dmitry Vyukov
> >
> > in_softirq() is a wrong predicate to check if we are in a softirq context.
> > It also returns true if we have BH disabled, so objects are falsely
On Fri, 17 May 2019 19:15:07 +0200 Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> From: Dmitry Vyukov
>
> in_softirq() is a wrong predicate to check if we are in a softirq context.
> It also returns true if we have BH disabled, so objects are falsely
> stamped with "softirq" comm. The correct predicate is
From: Dmitry Vyukov
in_softirq() is a wrong predicate to check if we are in a softirq context.
It also returns true if we have BH disabled, so objects are falsely
stamped with "softirq" comm. The correct predicate is in_serving_softirq().
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov
Cc: linux...@kvack.org
Cc:
4 matches
Mail list logo