Re: [PATCH] kobject: Add support for default attribute groups to kobj_type

2019-03-23 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:48:21PM -0400, Kimberly Brown wrote: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 07:07:37AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 04:14:40PM -0400, Kimberly Brown wrote: > > > kobj_type currently uses a list of individual attributes to store > > > default

Re: [PATCH] kobject: Add support for default attribute groups to kobj_type

2019-03-23 Thread Kimberly Brown
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 07:07:37AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 04:14:40PM -0400, Kimberly Brown wrote: > > kobj_type currently uses a list of individual attributes to store > > default attributes. Attribute groups are more flexible than a list of > > attributes

Re: [PATCH] kobject: Add support for default attribute groups to kobj_type

2019-03-23 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 04:14:40PM -0400, Kimberly Brown wrote: > kobj_type currently uses a list of individual attributes to store > default attributes. Attribute groups are more flexible than a list of > attributes because groups provide support for attribute visibility. So, > add support for

[PATCH] kobject: Add support for default attribute groups to kobj_type

2019-03-22 Thread Kimberly Brown
kobj_type currently uses a list of individual attributes to store default attributes. Attribute groups are more flexible than a list of attributes because groups provide support for attribute visibility. So, add support for default attribute groups to kobj_type. In future patches, the existing