Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 04/21/17 15:27, gengdongjiu wrote: > Hi all/Laszlo, > > sorry, I have a question to consult with you. > > > On 2017/4/7 2:55, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 04/06/17 14:35, gengdongjiu wrote: >>> Dear, Laszlo >>>Thanks for your detailed explanation. >>> >>> On 2017/3/29 19:58, Laszlo Ersek

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 04/21/17 15:27, gengdongjiu wrote: > Hi all/Laszlo, > > sorry, I have a question to consult with you. > > > On 2017/4/7 2:55, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 04/06/17 14:35, gengdongjiu wrote: >>> Dear, Laszlo >>>Thanks for your detailed explanation. >>> >>> On 2017/3/29 19:58, Laszlo Ersek

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi all/Laszlo, sorry, I have a question to consult with you. On 2017/4/7 2:55, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 04/06/17 14:35, gengdongjiu wrote: >> Dear, Laszlo >>Thanks for your detailed explanation. >> >> On 2017/3/29 19:58, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >>> (This ought to be one of the longest address

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi all/Laszlo, sorry, I have a question to consult with you. On 2017/4/7 2:55, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 04/06/17 14:35, gengdongjiu wrote: >> Dear, Laszlo >>Thanks for your detailed explanation. >> >> On 2017/3/29 19:58, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >>> (This ought to be one of the longest address

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 04/07/17 04:52, gengdongjiu wrote: > > On 2017/4/7 2:55, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> I'm unsure if, by "not fixed", you are saying >> >> the number of CPER entries that fits in Error Status Data Block N is >> not *uniform* across 0 <= N <= 10 [1] >> >> or >> >> the number of CPER entries

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 04/07/17 04:52, gengdongjiu wrote: > > On 2017/4/7 2:55, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> I'm unsure if, by "not fixed", you are saying >> >> the number of CPER entries that fits in Error Status Data Block N is >> not *uniform* across 0 <= N <= 10 [1] >> >> or >> >> the number of CPER entries

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi Laszlo, thanks. On 2017/4/7 2:55, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 04/06/17 14:35, gengdongjiu wrote: >> Dear, Laszlo >>Thanks for your detailed explanation. >> >> On 2017/3/29 19:58, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >>> (This ought to be one of the longest address lists I've ever seen :) >>> Thanks for the

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi Laszlo, thanks. On 2017/4/7 2:55, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 04/06/17 14:35, gengdongjiu wrote: >> Dear, Laszlo >>Thanks for your detailed explanation. >> >> On 2017/3/29 19:58, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >>> (This ought to be one of the longest address lists I've ever seen :) >>> Thanks for the

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 04/06/17 14:35, gengdongjiu wrote: > Dear, Laszlo >Thanks for your detailed explanation. > > On 2017/3/29 19:58, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> (This ought to be one of the longest address lists I've ever seen :) >> Thanks for the CC. I'm glad Shannon is already on the CC list. For good >>

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 04/06/17 14:35, gengdongjiu wrote: > Dear, Laszlo >Thanks for your detailed explanation. > > On 2017/3/29 19:58, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> (This ought to be one of the longest address lists I've ever seen :) >> Thanks for the CC. I'm glad Shannon is already on the CC list. For good >>

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Dear, Laszlo Thanks for your detailed explanation. On 2017/3/29 19:58, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > (This ought to be one of the longest address lists I've ever seen :) > Thanks for the CC. I'm glad Shannon is already on the CC list. For good > measure, I'm adding MST and Igor.) > > On 03/29/17

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Dear, Laszlo Thanks for your detailed explanation. On 2017/3/29 19:58, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > (This ought to be one of the longest address lists I've ever seen :) > Thanks for the CC. I'm glad Shannon is already on the CC list. For good > measure, I'm adding MST and Igor.) > > On 03/29/17

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi Christoffer/Laszlo, On 2017/3/30 1:44, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:37:49PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 03/29/17 16:48, Christoffer Dall wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:36:51PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: 2017-03-29 18:36 GMT+08:00, Achin Gupta

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi Christoffer/Laszlo, On 2017/3/30 1:44, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:37:49PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> On 03/29/17 16:48, Christoffer Dall wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:36:51PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: 2017-03-29 18:36 GMT+08:00, Achin Gupta : >> >

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:37:49PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 03/29/17 16:48, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:36:51PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: > >> 2017-03-29 18:36 GMT+08:00, Achin Gupta : > > >>> Qemu is essentially fulfilling the role of secure

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:37:49PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 03/29/17 16:48, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:36:51PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: > >> 2017-03-29 18:36 GMT+08:00, Achin Gupta : > > >>> Qemu is essentially fulfilling the role of secure firmware at the >

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 03/29/17 16:48, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:36:51PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: >> 2017-03-29 18:36 GMT+08:00, Achin Gupta : >>> Qemu is essentially fulfilling the role of secure firmware at the >>> EL2/EL1 interface (as discussed with Christoffer

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 03/29/17 16:48, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:36:51PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: >> 2017-03-29 18:36 GMT+08:00, Achin Gupta : >>> Qemu is essentially fulfilling the role of secure firmware at the >>> EL2/EL1 interface (as discussed with Christoffer below). So it >>>

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:36:51PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: > Hi Achin, > Thanks for your mail and answer. > > 2017-03-29 18:36 GMT+08:00, Achin Gupta : > > Hi gengdongjiu, > > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:36:37PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: > >> > >> Hi

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:36:51PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: > Hi Achin, > Thanks for your mail and answer. > > 2017-03-29 18:36 GMT+08:00, Achin Gupta : > > Hi gengdongjiu, > > > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:36:37PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: > >> > >> Hi Laszlo/Biesheuvel/Qemu developer, > >>

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi Achin, Thanks for your mail and answer. 2017-03-29 18:36 GMT+08:00, Achin Gupta : > Hi gengdongjiu, > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:36:37PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: >> >> Hi Laszlo/Biesheuvel/Qemu developer, >> >>Now I encounter a issue and want to consult with you

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi Achin, Thanks for your mail and answer. 2017-03-29 18:36 GMT+08:00, Achin Gupta : > Hi gengdongjiu, > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:36:37PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: >> >> Hi Laszlo/Biesheuvel/Qemu developer, >> >>Now I encounter a issue and want to consult with you in ARM64 platform， >>

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Laszlo Ersek writes: > On 03/29/17 14:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 01:58:29PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >>> (8) When QEMU gets SIGBUS from the kernel -- I hope that's going to come >>> through a signalfd -- QEMU can format the CPER right into guest

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Laszlo Ersek writes: > On 03/29/17 14:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 01:58:29PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >>> (8) When QEMU gets SIGBUS from the kernel -- I hope that's going to come >>> through a signalfd -- QEMU can format the CPER right into guest memory, >>> and

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 03:36:59PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 03/29/17 14:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 01:58:29PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > >> (8) When QEMU gets SIGBUS from the kernel -- I hope that's going to come > >> through a signalfd -- QEMU can format

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 03:36:59PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 03/29/17 14:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 01:58:29PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > >> (8) When QEMU gets SIGBUS from the kernel -- I hope that's going to come > >> through a signalfd -- QEMU can format

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 03/29/17 14:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 01:58:29PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> (8) When QEMU gets SIGBUS from the kernel -- I hope that's going to come >> through a signalfd -- QEMU can format the CPER right into guest memory, >> and then inject whatever interrupt

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 03/29/17 14:51, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 01:58:29PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> (8) When QEMU gets SIGBUS from the kernel -- I hope that's going to come >> through a signalfd -- QEMU can format the CPER right into guest memory, >> and then inject whatever interrupt

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 01:58:29PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > (8) When QEMU gets SIGBUS from the kernel -- I hope that's going to come > through a signalfd -- QEMU can format the CPER right into guest memory, > and then inject whatever interrupt (or assert whatever GPIO line) is > necessary for

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 01:58:29PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > (8) When QEMU gets SIGBUS from the kernel -- I hope that's going to come > through a signalfd -- QEMU can format the CPER right into guest memory, > and then inject whatever interrupt (or assert whatever GPIO line) is > necessary for

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

(This ought to be one of the longest address lists I've ever seen :) Thanks for the CC. I'm glad Shannon is already on the CC list. For good measure, I'm adding MST and Igor.) On 03/29/17 12:36, Achin Gupta wrote: > Hi gengdongjiu, > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:36:37PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote:

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

(This ought to be one of the longest address lists I've ever seen :) Thanks for the CC. I'm glad Shannon is already on the CC list. For good measure, I'm adding MST and Igor.) On 03/29/17 12:36, Achin Gupta wrote: > Hi gengdongjiu, > > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:36:37PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote:

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi gengdongjiu, On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:36:37PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: > > Hi Laszlo/Biesheuvel/Qemu developer, > >Now I encounter a issue and want to consult with you in ARM64 platform， as > described below: > >when guest OS happen synchronous or asynchronous abort, kvm needs to

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi gengdongjiu, On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:36:37PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: > > Hi Laszlo/Biesheuvel/Qemu developer, > >Now I encounter a issue and want to consult with you in ARM64 platform， as > described below: > >when guest OS happen synchronous or asynchronous abort, kvm needs to

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi Laszlo/Biesheuvel/Qemu developer, Now I encounter a issue and want to consult with you in ARM64 platform， as described below: when guest OS happen synchronous or asynchronous abort, kvm needs to send the error address to Qemu or UEFI through sigbus to dynamically generate APEI

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi Laszlo/Biesheuvel/Qemu developer, Now I encounter a issue and want to consult with you in ARM64 platform， as described below: when guest OS happen synchronous or asynchronous abort, kvm needs to send the error address to Qemu or UEFI through sigbus to dynamically generate APEI

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi gengdongjiu, On 28/03/17 13:16, gengdongjiu wrote: > On 2017/3/28 19:54, Achin Gupta wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:23:28PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:48:08AM +0100, James Morse wrote: On the host, part of UEFI is involved to generate the CPER

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 02:24:55PM +0100, Achin Gupta wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 02:22:29PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:54:13PM +0100, Achin Gupta wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:23:28PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi gengdongjiu, On 28/03/17 13:16, gengdongjiu wrote: > On 2017/3/28 19:54, Achin Gupta wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:23:28PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:48:08AM +0100, James Morse wrote: On the host, part of UEFI is involved to generate the CPER

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 02:24:55PM +0100, Achin Gupta wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 02:22:29PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:54:13PM +0100, Achin Gupta wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:23:28PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi Peter, On 28/03/17 12:33, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 28 March 2017 at 12:23, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:48:08AM +0100, James Morse wrote: >>> On the host, part of UEFI is involved to generate the CPER records. >>> In a guest?, I don't know. >>> Qemu

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi Peter, On 28/03/17 12:33, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 28 March 2017 at 12:23, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:48:08AM +0100, James Morse wrote: >>> On the host, part of UEFI is involved to generate the CPER records. >>> In a guest?, I don't know. >>> Qemu could generate

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 02:22:29PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:54:13PM +0100, Achin Gupta wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:23:28PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:48:08AM +0100, James Morse wrote: > > > > Hi Christoffer, > > > >

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 02:22:29PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:54:13PM +0100, Achin Gupta wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:23:28PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:48:08AM +0100, James Morse wrote: > > > > Hi Christoffer, > > > >

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:54:13PM +0100, Achin Gupta wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:23:28PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:48:08AM +0100, James Morse wrote: > > > Hi Christoffer, > > > > > > (CC: Leif and Achin who know more about how UEFI fits into this

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:54:13PM +0100, Achin Gupta wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:23:28PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:48:08AM +0100, James Morse wrote: > > > Hi Christoffer, > > > > > > (CC: Leif and Achin who know more about how UEFI fits into this

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi all, On 2017/3/28 19:54, Achin Gupta wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:23:28PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:48:08AM +0100, James Morse wrote: >>> Hi Christoffer, >>> >>> (CC: Leif and Achin who know more about how UEFI fits into this picture) >>> >>> On

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi all, On 2017/3/28 19:54, Achin Gupta wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:23:28PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:48:08AM +0100, James Morse wrote: >>> Hi Christoffer, >>> >>> (CC: Leif and Achin who know more about how UEFI fits into this picture) >>> >>> On

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:23:28PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:48:08AM +0100, James Morse wrote: > > Hi Christoffer, > > > > (CC: Leif and Achin who know more about how UEFI fits into this picture) > > > > On 21/03/17 19:39, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:23:28PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:48:08AM +0100, James Morse wrote: > > Hi Christoffer, > > > > (CC: Leif and Achin who know more about how UEFI fits into this picture) > > > > On 21/03/17 19:39, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 28 March 2017 at 12:23, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:48:08AM +0100, James Morse wrote: >> On the host, part of UEFI is involved to generate the CPER records. >> In a guest?, I don't know. >> Qemu could generate the records, or drive some other

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 28 March 2017 at 12:23, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:48:08AM +0100, James Morse wrote: >> On the host, part of UEFI is involved to generate the CPER records. >> In a guest?, I don't know. >> Qemu could generate the records, or drive some other component to do it. > > I

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:48:08AM +0100, James Morse wrote: > Hi Christoffer, > > (CC: Leif and Achin who know more about how UEFI fits into this picture) > > On 21/03/17 19:39, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 07:11:44PM +, James Morse wrote: > >> On 21/03/17 11:34,

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:48:08AM +0100, James Morse wrote: > Hi Christoffer, > > (CC: Leif and Achin who know more about how UEFI fits into this picture) > > On 21/03/17 19:39, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 07:11:44PM +, James Morse wrote: > >> On 21/03/17 11:34,

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi Christoffer, (CC: Leif and Achin who know more about how UEFI fits into this picture) On 21/03/17 19:39, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 07:11:44PM +, James Morse wrote: >> On 21/03/17 11:34, Christoffer Dall wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:32:29PM +0800,

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi Christoffer, (CC: Leif and Achin who know more about how UEFI fits into this picture) On 21/03/17 19:39, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 07:11:44PM +, James Morse wrote: >> On 21/03/17 11:34, Christoffer Dall wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:32:29PM +0800,

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi gengdongjiu On 22/03/17 13:37, gengdongjiu wrote: > On 2017/3/21 21:10, James Morse wrote: >> On 21/03/17 06:32, gengdongjiu wrote: >>> so for both SEA and SEI, do you prefer to below steps? >>> EL0/EL1 SEI/SEA ---> EL3 firmware first handle --> EL2 hypervisor >>> notify > >> the Qemu to

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi gengdongjiu On 22/03/17 13:37, gengdongjiu wrote: > On 2017/3/21 21:10, James Morse wrote: >> On 21/03/17 06:32, gengdongjiu wrote: >>> so for both SEA and SEI, do you prefer to below steps? >>> EL0/EL1 SEI/SEA ---> EL3 firmware first handle --> EL2 hypervisor >>> notify > >> the Qemu to

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi James, Thank you very much for your detailed comment and answer. On 2017/3/21 21:10, James Morse wrote: > Hi, > > On 21/03/17 06:32, gengdongjiu wrote: >> On 2017/3/20 23:08, James Morse wrote: >>> On 20/03/17 13:58, Marc Zyngier wrote: On 20/03/17 12:28, gengdongjiu wrote: > On

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi James, Thank you very much for your detailed comment and answer. On 2017/3/21 21:10, James Morse wrote: > Hi, > > On 21/03/17 06:32, gengdongjiu wrote: >> On 2017/3/20 23:08, James Morse wrote: >>> On 20/03/17 13:58, Marc Zyngier wrote: On 20/03/17 12:28, gengdongjiu wrote: > On

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 21/03/17 22:10, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 21 March 2017 at 19:39, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> My confusion here comes from not thinking about QEMU or KVM as firmware, >> but as the machine, so it would be sort of like the functionality is >> baked into hardware rather than

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 21/03/17 22:10, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 21 March 2017 at 19:39, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> My confusion here comes from not thinking about QEMU or KVM as firmware, >> but as the machine, so it would be sort of like the functionality is >> baked into hardware rather than firmware. > > There

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi kbuild test robot, Thank you. The build error is due to "vsesr_el2" is armv8.2 register, I will change "vsesr_el2" to sysreg usage On 2017/3/21 21:51, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi Dongjiu, > > [auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core] > [also build test ERROR on v4.11-rc3

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi kbuild test robot, Thank you. The build error is due to "vsesr_el2" is armv8.2 register, I will change "vsesr_el2" to sysreg usage On 2017/3/21 21:51, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi Dongjiu, > > [auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core] > [also build test ERROR on v4.11-rc3

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 21 March 2017 at 19:39, Christoffer Dall wrote: > My confusion here comes from not thinking about QEMU or KVM as firmware, > but as the machine, so it would be sort of like the functionality is > baked into hardware rather than firmware. There is precedent for that kind of

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 21 March 2017 at 19:39, Christoffer Dall wrote: > My confusion here comes from not thinking about QEMU or KVM as firmware, > but as the machine, so it would be sort of like the functionality is > baked into hardware rather than firmware. There is precedent for that kind of thing -- we

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

[resending as clear text - I thought GMail supported that - sorry] On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 07:11:44PM +, James Morse wrote: > Hi Christoffer, > > On 21/03/17 11:34, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:32:29PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: > >> On 2017/3/20 23:08, James Morse

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

[resending as clear text - I thought GMail supported that - sorry] On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 07:11:44PM +, James Morse wrote: > Hi Christoffer, > > On 21/03/17 11:34, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:32:29PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: > >> On 2017/3/20 23:08, James Morse

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi Christoffer, On 21/03/17 11:34, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:32:29PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: >> On 2017/3/20 23:08, James Morse wrote: >> On 20/03/17 07:55, Dongjiu Geng wrote: >>> In the RAS implementation, hardware pass the virtual SEI >>> syndrome

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi Christoffer, On 21/03/17 11:34, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:32:29PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: >> On 2017/3/20 23:08, James Morse wrote: >> On 20/03/17 07:55, Dongjiu Geng wrote: >>> In the RAS implementation, hardware pass the virtual SEI >>> syndrome

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi Dongjiu, [auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core] [also build test ERROR on v4.11-rc3 next-20170321] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi Dongjiu, [auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core] [also build test ERROR on v4.11-rc3 next-20170321] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url:

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi, On 21/03/17 06:32, gengdongjiu wrote: > On 2017/3/20 23:08, James Morse wrote: >> On 20/03/17 13:58, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> On 20/03/17 12:28, gengdongjiu wrote: On 2017/3/20 19:24, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 20/03/17 07:55, Dongjiu Geng wrote: >> In the RAS implementation,

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi, On 21/03/17 06:32, gengdongjiu wrote: > On 2017/3/20 23:08, James Morse wrote: >> On 20/03/17 13:58, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> On 20/03/17 12:28, gengdongjiu wrote: On 2017/3/20 19:24, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 20/03/17 07:55, Dongjiu Geng wrote: >> In the RAS implementation,

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:32:29PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: > > > On 2017/3/20 23:08, James Morse wrote: > > Hi Dongjiu Geng, > > > > On 20/03/17 13:58, Marc Zyngier wrote: > >> On 20/03/17 12:28, gengdongjiu wrote: > >>> On 2017/3/20 19:24, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Please include James

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 02:32:29PM +0800, gengdongjiu wrote: > > > On 2017/3/20 23:08, James Morse wrote: > > Hi Dongjiu Geng, > > > > On 20/03/17 13:58, Marc Zyngier wrote: > >> On 20/03/17 12:28, gengdongjiu wrote: > >>> On 2017/3/20 19:24, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Please include James

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 2017/3/20 23:08, James Morse wrote: > Hi Dongjiu Geng, > > On 20/03/17 13:58, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> On 20/03/17 12:28, gengdongjiu wrote: >>> On 2017/3/20 19:24, Marc Zyngier wrote: Please include James Morse on anything RAS related, as he's already looking at related patches. >

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 2017/3/20 23:08, James Morse wrote: > Hi Dongjiu Geng, > > On 20/03/17 13:58, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> On 20/03/17 12:28, gengdongjiu wrote: >>> On 2017/3/20 19:24, Marc Zyngier wrote: Please include James Morse on anything RAS related, as he's already looking at related patches. >

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi Marc, Thank you very much for your review. On 2017/3/20 21:58, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 20/03/17 12:28, gengdongjiu wrote: >> >> >> On 2017/3/20 19:24, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> Please include James Morse on anything RAS related, as he's already >>> looking at related patches. >>> >>> On

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi Marc, Thank you very much for your review. On 2017/3/20 21:58, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 20/03/17 12:28, gengdongjiu wrote: >> >> >> On 2017/3/20 19:24, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> Please include James Morse on anything RAS related, as he's already >>> looking at related patches. >>> >>> On

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi Dongjiu Geng, On 20/03/17 13:58, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 20/03/17 12:28, gengdongjiu wrote: >> On 2017/3/20 19:24, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> Please include James Morse on anything RAS related, as he's already >>> looking at related patches. (Thanks Marc,) >>> On 20/03/17 07:55, Dongjiu Geng

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Hi Dongjiu Geng, On 20/03/17 13:58, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 20/03/17 12:28, gengdongjiu wrote: >> On 2017/3/20 19:24, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> Please include James Morse on anything RAS related, as he's already >>> looking at related patches. (Thanks Marc,) >>> On 20/03/17 07:55, Dongjiu Geng

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 20/03/17 12:28, gengdongjiu wrote: > > > On 2017/3/20 19:24, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> Please include James Morse on anything RAS related, as he's already >> looking at related patches. >> >> On 20/03/17 07:55, Dongjiu Geng wrote: >>> In the RAS implementation, hardware pass the virtual SEI >>>

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 20/03/17 12:28, gengdongjiu wrote: > > > On 2017/3/20 19:24, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> Please include James Morse on anything RAS related, as he's already >> looking at related patches. >> >> On 20/03/17 07:55, Dongjiu Geng wrote: >>> In the RAS implementation, hardware pass the virtual SEI >>>

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 2017/3/20 19:24, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Please include James Morse on anything RAS related, as he's already > looking at related patches. > > On 20/03/17 07:55, Dongjiu Geng wrote: >> In the RAS implementation, hardware pass the virtual SEI >> syndrome information through the VSESR_EL2, so

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

On 2017/3/20 19:24, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Please include James Morse on anything RAS related, as he's already > looking at related patches. > > On 20/03/17 07:55, Dongjiu Geng wrote: >> In the RAS implementation, hardware pass the virtual SEI >> syndrome information through the VSESR_EL2, so

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Please include James Morse on anything RAS related, as he's already looking at related patches. On 20/03/17 07:55, Dongjiu Geng wrote: > In the RAS implementation, hardware pass the virtual SEI > syndrome information through the VSESR_EL2, so set the virtual > SEI syndrome using physical SEI

Re: [PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

Please include James Morse on anything RAS related, as he's already looking at related patches. On 20/03/17 07:55, Dongjiu Geng wrote: > In the RAS implementation, hardware pass the virtual SEI > syndrome information through the VSESR_EL2, so set the virtual > SEI syndrome using physical SEI

[PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

In the RAS implementation, hardware pass the virtual SEI syndrome information through the VSESR_EL2, so set the virtual SEI syndrome using physical SEI syndrome el2_elr to pass to the guest OS Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng Signed-off-by: Quanming wu

[PATCH] kvm: pass the virtual SEI syndrome to guest OS

In the RAS implementation, hardware pass the virtual SEI syndrome information through the VSESR_EL2, so set the virtual SEI syndrome using physical SEI syndrome el2_elr to pass to the guest OS Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng Signed-off-by: Quanming wu --- arch/arm64/Kconfig | 8