On 24/11/2014 15:26, Eric Auger wrote:
>> > +#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_IOAPIC
>> > +void kvm_vcpu_request_scan_ioapic(struct kvm *kvm);
>> > +#else
>> > +static inline void kvm_vcpu_request-scan_ioapic(struct kvm *kvm)
> Hi Paolo,
>
> you have a typo above: "-" instead of "_".
Indeed, thanks. The fixe
On 11/20/2014 02:42 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> ia64 does not need them anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 16
> arch/x86/kvm/Makefile | 5 ++---
> {virt => arch/x86}/kvm/ioapic.c | 0
> {virt => arch/x86}/kvm/ioa
2014-11-21 18:05+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 21/11/2014 17:19, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> > KVM: x86: remove IA64 from ioapic.c and irq_comm.c
> >
> > They won't get compiled in x86 tree.
>
> Ah no, these were already in my ia64 removal patch. I had a deja-vu
> feeling...
Oops, renaming simplifies con
On 21/11/2014 17:19, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> KVM: x86: remove IA64 from ioapic.c and irq_comm.c
>
> They won't get compiled in x86 tree.
Ah no, these were already in my ia64 removal patch. I had a deja-vu
feeling...
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
On 21/11/2014 17:19, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> 2014-11-20 14:42+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
>> ia64 does not need them anymore.
>
> (Similar for device assignment and iommu, should I prepare patches?)
Sure! Feel free to join the party. ;)
Paolo
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
>> ---
>
> At least one co
2014-11-20 14:42+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> ia64 does not need them anymore.
(Similar for device assignment and iommu, should I prepare patches?)
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
> ---
At least one compile-breaker on arches without IOAPIC,
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_
ia64 does not need them anymore.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 16
arch/x86/kvm/Makefile | 5 ++---
{virt => arch/x86}/kvm/ioapic.c | 0
{virt => arch/x86}/kvm/ioapic.h | 1 -
{virt => arch/x86}/kvm/irq_comm.c | 4 ++--
7 matches
Mail list logo
