> > +config HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT
> > + def_bool y
> > +
> No.
> Please do:
> config X86
> + select HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT
>
> Yes - this is a valid use of select.
>
> See Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt
Ok, I wasn't aware of that. For now I'll leave it as is
as Ingo
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 02:32:28PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > config STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
> > > def_bool y
> > >
> > > +config HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT
> > > + def_bool y
> > > +
> > No.
> > Please do:
> > config X86
> > + select
* Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > config STACKTRACE_SUPPORT
> > def_bool y
> >
> > +config HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT
> > + def_bool y
> > +
> No.
> Please do:
> config X86
> + select HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT
>
> Yes - this is a valid use of select.
i see - and there's
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 02:06:36PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> From: Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Change latencytop Kconfig entry so it doesn't list the archictectures
> that support it. Instead introduce HAVE_LATENCY_SUPPORT which any
> architecture can set. Should reduce patch
* Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Change latencytop Kconfig entry so it doesn't list the archictectures
> that support it. Instead introduce HAVE_LATENCY_SUPPORT which any
> architecture can set. Should reduce patch conflicts.
thanks,
From: Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Change latencytop Kconfig entry so it doesn't list the archictectures
that support it. Instead introduce HAVE_LATENCY_SUPPORT which any
architecture can set. Should reduce patch conflicts.
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL
From: Heiko Carstens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Change latencytop Kconfig entry so it doesn't list the archictectures
that support it. Instead introduce HAVE_LATENCY_SUPPORT which any
architecture can set. Should reduce patch conflicts.
Cc: Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 02:06:36PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
From: Heiko Carstens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Change latencytop Kconfig entry so it doesn't list the archictectures
that support it. Instead introduce HAVE_LATENCY_SUPPORT which any
architecture can set. Should reduce patch conflicts.
* Heiko Carstens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Heiko Carstens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Change latencytop Kconfig entry so it doesn't list the archictectures
that support it. Instead introduce HAVE_LATENCY_SUPPORT which any
architecture can set. Should reduce patch conflicts.
thanks, applied.
+config HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT
+ def_bool y
+
No.
Please do:
config X86
+ select HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT
Yes - this is a valid use of select.
See Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt
Ok, I wasn't aware of that. For now I'll leave it as is
as Ingo requested.
--
To
10 matches
Mail list logo