Please forget about my last email :
#define PPC_STLCX stringify_in_c(stdcx.)
and
#define PPC_STLCX stringify_in_c(stwcx.)
are self explaining. :)
Mathieu
* Kumar Gala ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:02 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> >* Kumar Gala ([EMAIL PRO
On Feb 15, 2007, at 3:23 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Kumar Gala ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:02 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Kumar Gala ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
is there a reason this isn't local_add_return(long a, local_t
*l) on
ppc32?
(same comment for other
* Kumar Gala ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:02 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> >* Kumar Gala ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >>is there a reason this isn't local_add_return(long a, local_t *l) on
> >>ppc32?
> >>
> >>(same comment for other functions)
> >>
> >>- k
> >
> >no, ex
On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:02 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Kumar Gala ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
is there a reason this isn't local_add_return(long a, local_t *l) on
ppc32?
(same comment for other functions)
- k
no, except that we use the code is taken from atomic.h and used an
int parameter.
* Kumar Gala ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> is there a reason this isn't local_add_return(long a, local_t *l) on
> ppc32?
>
> (same comment for other functions)
>
> - k
no, except that we use the code is taken from atomic.h and used an
int parameter. However, due to the semantics of local_t, we
5 matches
Mail list logo