Re: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Shorten the __atomic_op() defines to __op()

2018-05-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Ingo Molnar wrote: > If that's too then there's a few more things we could do - for example the ^--too much > attached patch renames a (very minor) misnomer to a shorter name and thus > saves on > the longest lines, the column histogram now looks like this:

Re: [PATCH] locking/atomics: Shorten the __atomic_op() defines to __op()

2018-05-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Ingo Molnar wrote: > If that's too then there's a few more things we could do - for example the ^--too much > attached patch renames a (very minor) misnomer to a shorter name and thus > saves on > the longest lines, the column histogram now looks like this: Thanks,

[PATCH] locking/atomics: Shorten the __atomic_op() defines to __op()

2018-05-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
3 87 1 88 4 89 13 90 7 91 20 92 18 93 12 94 11 96 5 I.e. the longest line is down to 96 columns, and 99% of the file is 94 cols or shorter. Is this still too long? Thanks, Ingo > From: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org&g

[PATCH] locking/atomics: Shorten the __atomic_op() defines to __op()

2018-05-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
hen there's a few more things we could do - for example the attached patch renames a (very minor) misnomer to a shorter name and thus saves on the longest lines, the column histogram now looks like this: 79 4 80 7 81 3 82 9 84 4 85 2 86 3 87 1 88 4 89 13