Re: [PATCH] locking: remove three unused Kconfig symbols

2013-04-08 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Paul Bolle wrote: > On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 17:16 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Paul Bolle wrote: > > > The Kconfig symbols ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ, > > > ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQ, and ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQ were added > > > in v2.6.33, but have never actually been used. It is

Re: [PATCH] locking: remove three unused Kconfig symbols

2013-04-08 Thread Paul Bolle
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 17:30 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > Would you have any idea why this problem wasn't noticed in 16 (!) > releases? Fedora 17, which I did this patch on, has Kconfig symbolk > PREEMPT not set. Is it perhaps commit to not enable that option? s/commit/common/ (and, obviously,

Re: [PATCH] locking: remove three unused Kconfig symbols

2013-04-08 Thread Paul Bolle
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 17:16 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Paul Bolle wrote: > > The Kconfig symbols ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ, > > ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQ, and ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQ were added > > in v2.6.33, but have never actually been used. It is safe to remove > > these. > > >

Re: [PATCH] locking: remove three unused Kconfig symbols

2013-04-08 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Paul Bolle wrote: > The Kconfig symbols ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ, > ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQ, and ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQ were added > in v2.6.33, but have never actually been used. It is safe to remove > these. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle > --- > Untested. These three symbols

[PATCH] locking: remove three unused Kconfig symbols

2013-04-08 Thread Paul Bolle
The Kconfig symbols ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ, ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQ, and ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQ were added in v2.6.33, but have never actually been used. It is safe to remove these. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle --- Untested. These three symbols were added in commit

[PATCH] locking: remove three unused Kconfig symbols

2013-04-08 Thread Paul Bolle
The Kconfig symbols ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ, ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQ, and ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQ were added in v2.6.33, but have never actually been used. It is safe to remove these. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl --- Untested. These three symbols were added in commit

Re: [PATCH] locking: remove three unused Kconfig symbols

2013-04-08 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl wrote: The Kconfig symbols ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ, ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQ, and ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQ were added in v2.6.33, but have never actually been used. It is safe to remove these. Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl ---

Re: [PATCH] locking: remove three unused Kconfig symbols

2013-04-08 Thread Paul Bolle
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 17:16 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl wrote: The Kconfig symbols ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ, ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQ, and ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQ were added in v2.6.33, but have never actually been used. It is safe to remove these.

Re: [PATCH] locking: remove three unused Kconfig symbols

2013-04-08 Thread Paul Bolle
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 17:30 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: Would you have any idea why this problem wasn't noticed in 16 (!) releases? Fedora 17, which I did this patch on, has Kconfig symbolk PREEMPT not set. Is it perhaps commit to not enable that option? s/commit/common/ (and, obviously,

Re: [PATCH] locking: remove three unused Kconfig symbols

2013-04-08 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl wrote: On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 17:16 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Paul Bolle pebo...@tiscali.nl wrote: The Kconfig symbols ARCH_INLINE_READ_UNLOCK_IRQ, ARCH_INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK_IRQ, and ARCH_INLINE_WRITE_UNLOCK_IRQ were added in v2.6.33, but have never