On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:10:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Martin Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Working on some code lately I've been getting huge values
> > for "Cached". The cause is that get_page_cache_size() is an
> > approximate value, and for a sufficiently small returned
Martin Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Working on some code lately I've been getting huge values
> for "Cached". The cause is that get_page_cache_size() is an
> approximate value, and for a sufficiently small returned value
> of get_page_cache_size() the value underflows.
OK..
I think I'd
Hi,
This patch was generated against 2.6.12-rc1
Working on some code lately I've been getting huge values
for "Cached". The cause is that get_page_cache_size() is an
approximate value, and for a sufficiently small returned value
of get_page_cache_size() the value underflows.
Signed-off-by:
Hi,
This patch was generated against 2.6.12-rc1
Working on some code lately I've been getting huge values
for Cached. The cause is that get_page_cache_size() is an
approximate value, and for a sufficiently small returned value
of get_page_cache_size() the value underflows.
Signed-off-by:
Martin Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Working on some code lately I've been getting huge values
for Cached. The cause is that get_page_cache_size() is an
approximate value, and for a sufficiently small returned value
of get_page_cache_size() the value underflows.
OK..
I think I'd prefer to
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 03:10:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Martin Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Working on some code lately I've been getting huge values
for Cached. The cause is that get_page_cache_size() is an
approximate value, and for a sufficiently small returned value
of
6 matches
Mail list logo
