Ping? I haven't heard anything on this.
Thanks,
-corey
On 09/18/2014 07:58 AM, Corey Minyard wrote:
> On 09/18/2014 04:58 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 04:45:25PM -0500, miny...@acm.org wrote:
>>
>>> From: Corey Minyard
>>>
>>> The MIPS frame save code was just saving a fe
On 09/18/2014 04:58 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 04:45:25PM -0500, miny...@acm.org wrote:
>
>> From: Corey Minyard
>>
>> The MIPS frame save code was just saving a few registers, enough to
>> do a backtrace if every function set up a frame. However, this is
>> not working if
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 04:45:25PM -0500, miny...@acm.org wrote:
> From: Corey Minyard
>
> The MIPS frame save code was just saving a few registers, enough to
> do a backtrace if every function set up a frame. However, this is
> not working if you are using DWARF unwinding, because most of the
Well, there's a bug I noticed in this patch, $1 is restored from the
wrong location.
I'm not sure $1 ($at) needs to be restored at all, really. I guess make
this a RFC.
-corey
On 09/16/2014 04:45 PM, miny...@acm.org wrote:
> From: Corey Minyard
>
> The MIPS frame save code was just saving a fe
From: Corey Minyard
The MIPS frame save code was just saving a few registers, enough to
do a backtrace if every function set up a frame. However, this is
not working if you are using DWARF unwinding, because most of the
registers are wrong. This was causing kdump backtraces to be short
or bogus
5 matches
Mail list logo