2015-04-01 5:38 GMT+06:00 Andrew Morton :
> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:08:03 +0600 Alexander Kuleshov
> wrote:
>
> I guess this should be "memblock_add:". That's what
> memblock_reserve_region() does?
>
> --- a/mm/memblock.c~mm-memblock-add-debug-output-for-the-memblock_add-fix
> +++
2015-04-01 5:38 GMT+06:00 Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org:
On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:08:03 +0600 Alexander Kuleshov
kuleshovm...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess this should be memblock_add:. That's what
memblock_reserve_region() does?
---
On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:08:03 +0600 Alexander Kuleshov
wrote:
> memblock_reserve function calls memblock_reserve_region which
> prints debugging information if 'memblock=debug' passed to the
> command line. This patch adds the same behaviour, but for the
> memblock_add function.
>
>
On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:08:03 +0600 Alexander Kuleshov kuleshovm...@gmail.com
wrote:
memblock_reserve function calls memblock_reserve_region which
prints debugging information if 'memblock=debug' passed to the
command line. This patch adds the same behaviour, but for the
memblock_add
memblock_reserve function calls memblock_reserve_region which
prints debugging information if 'memblock=debug' passed to the
command line. This patch adds the same behaviour, but for the
memblock_add function.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kuleshov
---
mm/memblock.c | 18 --
1 file
memblock_reserve function calls memblock_reserve_region which
prints debugging information if 'memblock=debug' passed to the
command line. This patch adds the same behaviour, but for the
memblock_add function.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kuleshov kuleshovm...@gmail.com
---
mm/memblock.c | 18
6 matches
Mail list logo