I seem to have botched the reply headers, so I am resending this. I use mutt
fairly infrequently, but I am making an effort to use it more it more.
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 02:21:43PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 01:24 +, Richard Yao wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-08-17
On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 01:24 +, Richard Yao wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-08-17 09:56:55 -0700, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 17:11 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Mon 17-08-15 16:56:32, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 15:54 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > >
I seem to have botched the reply headers, so I am resending this. I use mutt
fairly infrequently, but I am making an effort to use it more it more.
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 02:21:43PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 01:24 +, Richard Yao wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-08-17
On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 01:24 +, Richard Yao wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-08-17 09:56:55 -0700, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 17:11 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Mon 17-08-15 16:56:32, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 15:54 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > >
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 01:24:53AM +, Richard Yao wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-08-17 09:56:55 -0700, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 17:11 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Mon 17-08-15 16:56:32, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 15:54 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >
On Mon, 2015-08-17 09:56:55 -0700, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 17:11 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 17-08-15 16:56:32, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 15:54 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Sun 16-08-15 01:42:27, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > >
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 01:24:53AM +, Richard Yao wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-08-17 09:56:55 -0700, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 17:11 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Mon 17-08-15 16:56:32, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 15:54 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >
On Mon, 2015-08-17 09:56:55 -0700, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 17:11 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 17-08-15 16:56:32, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 15:54 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Sun 16-08-15 01:42:27, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > >
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 17:11 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 17-08-15 16:56:32, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 15:54 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Sun 16-08-15 01:42:27, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > Proprietary modules should not be able to touch vm_stat or participate
> >
On Mon 17-08-15 16:56:32, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 15:54 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Sun 16-08-15 01:42:27, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Proprietary modules should not be able to touch vm_stat or participate
> > > in shrinking.
> >
> > How does the external and !GPL fs
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 15:54 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Sun 16-08-15 01:42:27, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Proprietary modules should not be able to touch vm_stat or participate
> > in shrinking.
>
> How does the external and !GPL fs does slab reclaim? Those are essential
> for the proper memory
On Sun 16-08-15 01:42:27, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Proprietary modules should not be able to touch vm_stat or participate
> in shrinking.
How does the external and !GPL fs does slab reclaim? Those are essential
for the proper memory balancing.
You are probably right about vm_stat though. Those
On Sun 16-08-15 01:42:27, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Proprietary modules should not be able to touch vm_stat or participate
in shrinking.
How does the external and !GPL fs does slab reclaim? Those are essential
for the proper memory balancing.
You are probably right about vm_stat though. Those
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 17:11 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Mon 17-08-15 16:56:32, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 15:54 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Sun 16-08-15 01:42:27, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Proprietary modules should not be able to touch vm_stat or participate
in
On Mon 17-08-15 16:56:32, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 15:54 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Sun 16-08-15 01:42:27, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Proprietary modules should not be able to touch vm_stat or participate
in shrinking.
How does the external and !GPL fs does slab
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 15:54 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Sun 16-08-15 01:42:27, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Proprietary modules should not be able to touch vm_stat or participate
in shrinking.
How does the external and !GPL fs does slab reclaim? Those are essential
for the proper memory
Proprietary modules should not be able to touch vm_stat or participate
in shrinking.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings
---
mm/vmscan.c | 4 ++--
mm/vmstat.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 8286938..e6e7449 100644
---
Proprietary modules should not be able to touch vm_stat or participate
in shrinking.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
---
mm/vmscan.c | 4 ++--
mm/vmstat.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 8286938..e6e7449
18 matches
Mail list logo