On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 09:39:27AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Thierry reported that the "iron out" patch for isolate_freepages_block()
> had problems due to the strict check being too strict with "mm: compaction:
> Iron out isolate_freepages_block() and isolate_freepages_range() -fix1".
> It's
On 10/16/2012 04:39 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
Thierry reported that the "iron out" patch for isolate_freepages_block()
had problems due to the strict check being too strict with "mm: compaction:
Iron out isolate_freepages_block() and isolate_freepages_range() -fix1".
It's possible that more pages
Thierry reported that the "iron out" patch for isolate_freepages_block()
had problems due to the strict check being too strict with "mm: compaction:
Iron out isolate_freepages_block() and isolate_freepages_range() -fix1".
It's possible that more pages than necessary are isolated but the check
Thierry reported that the iron out patch for isolate_freepages_block()
had problems due to the strict check being too strict with mm: compaction:
Iron out isolate_freepages_block() and isolate_freepages_range() -fix1.
It's possible that more pages than necessary are isolated but the check
still
On 10/16/2012 04:39 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
Thierry reported that the iron out patch for isolate_freepages_block()
had problems due to the strict check being too strict with mm: compaction:
Iron out isolate_freepages_block() and isolate_freepages_range() -fix1.
It's possible that more pages than
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 09:39:27AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
Thierry reported that the iron out patch for isolate_freepages_block()
had problems due to the strict check being too strict with mm: compaction:
Iron out isolate_freepages_block() and isolate_freepages_range() -fix1.
It's possible
6 matches
Mail list logo