On 30 May 2018 at 23:41, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 08:13:27AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 08:14:09PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> > On 30 May 2018 at 20:01, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:28:43PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
On 30 May 2018 at 23:41, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 08:13:27AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 08:14:09PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> > On 30 May 2018 at 20:01, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:28:43PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 08:13:27AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 08:14:09PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > On 30 May 2018 at 20:01, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:28:43PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > >> It will be crash if we pass one NULL name
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 08:13:27AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 08:14:09PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > On 30 May 2018 at 20:01, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:28:43PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> > >> It will be crash if we pass one NULL name
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 08:14:09PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On 30 May 2018 at 20:01, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:28:43PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> >> It will be crash if we pass one NULL name when creating one dma pool,
> >> so we should check the passing name when
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 08:14:09PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On 30 May 2018 at 20:01, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:28:43PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> >> It will be crash if we pass one NULL name when creating one dma pool,
> >> so we should check the passing name when
On 30 May 2018 at 20:01, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:28:43PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> It will be crash if we pass one NULL name when creating one dma pool,
>> so we should check the passing name when copy it to dma pool.
>
> NAK. Crashing is the appropriate thing to
On 30 May 2018 at 20:01, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:28:43PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> It will be crash if we pass one NULL name when creating one dma pool,
>> so we should check the passing name when copy it to dma pool.
>
> NAK. Crashing is the appropriate thing to
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:28:43PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> It will be crash if we pass one NULL name when creating one dma pool,
> so we should check the passing name when copy it to dma pool.
NAK. Crashing is the appropriate thing to do. Fix the caller to not
pass NULL.
If you permit NULL
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:28:43PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> It will be crash if we pass one NULL name when creating one dma pool,
> so we should check the passing name when copy it to dma pool.
NAK. Crashing is the appropriate thing to do. Fix the caller to not
pass NULL.
If you permit NULL
It will be crash if we pass one NULL name when creating one dma pool,
so we should check the passing name when copy it to dma pool.
Moreover this patch replaces kmalloc_node() with kzalloc_node() to make
sure the name array of dma pool is initialized in case the passing name
is NULL.
It will be crash if we pass one NULL name when creating one dma pool,
so we should check the passing name when copy it to dma pool.
Moreover this patch replaces kmalloc_node() with kzalloc_node() to make
sure the name array of dma pool is initialized in case the passing name
is NULL.
12 matches
Mail list logo