On Mon 19-10-20 12:50:34, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 03:48:53AM -0400, Shijie Luo wrote:
> > When flags in queue_pages_pte_range don't have MPOL_MF_MOVE or
> > MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL
> > bits, code breaks and passing origin pte - 1 to pte_unmap_unlock seems like
> > not a good
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 03:48:53AM -0400, Shijie Luo wrote:
> When flags in queue_pages_pte_range don't have MPOL_MF_MOVE or
> MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL
> bits, code breaks and passing origin pte - 1 to pte_unmap_unlock seems like
> not a good idea.
I think the above is already explained below?
>
When flags in queue_pages_pte_range don't have MPOL_MF_MOVE or MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL
bits, code breaks and passing origin pte - 1 to pte_unmap_unlock seems like
not a good idea.
queue_pages_pte_range can run in MPOL_MF_MOVE_ALL mode which doesn't migrate
misplaced pages but returns with EIO when
3 matches
Mail list logo