Fuck off
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 2, 2020, at 11:01 AM, The Dellia’s wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
Sent from my iPhone
Hi Matthew,
On 2018/10/28 18:23, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 02:13:26PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
>> It's a trivial simplification for get_next_ra_size and
>> clear enough for humans to understand.
>>
>> It also fixes potential overflow if ra->size(< ra_pages) is too large.
>>
Hi Matthew,
On 2018/10/28 18:23, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 02:13:26PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
>> It's a trivial simplification for get_next_ra_size and
>> clear enough for humans to understand.
>>
>> It also fixes potential overflow if ra->size(< ra_pages) is too large.
>>
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 02:13:26PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> It's a trivial simplification for get_next_ra_size and
> clear enough for humans to understand.
>
> It also fixes potential overflow if ra->size(< ra_pages) is too large.
>
> Cc: Fengguang Wu
> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang
Reviewed-by:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 02:13:26PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> It's a trivial simplification for get_next_ra_size and
> clear enough for humans to understand.
>
> It also fixes potential overflow if ra->size(< ra_pages) is too large.
>
> Cc: Fengguang Wu
> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang
Reviewed-by:
Hi Fengguang,
On 2018/10/28 14:27, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Looks good to me, thanks!
>
> Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu
Thanks for taking time and the quickly review. :)
Best regards,
Gao Xiang
>
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 02:13:26PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
>> It's a trivial simplification for
Hi Fengguang,
On 2018/10/28 14:27, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Looks good to me, thanks!
>
> Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu
Thanks for taking time and the quickly review. :)
Best regards,
Gao Xiang
>
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 02:13:26PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
>> It's a trivial simplification for
Looks good to me, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 02:13:26PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
It's a trivial simplification for get_next_ra_size and
clear enough for humans to understand.
It also fixes potential overflow if ra->size(< ra_pages) is too large.
Cc: Fengguang
Looks good to me, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 02:13:26PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
It's a trivial simplification for get_next_ra_size and
clear enough for humans to understand.
It also fixes potential overflow if ra->size(< ra_pages) is too large.
Cc: Fengguang
It's a trivial simplification for get_next_ra_size and
clear enough for humans to understand.
It also fixes potential overflow if ra->size(< ra_pages) is too large.
Cc: Fengguang Wu
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang
---
mm/readahead.c | 12 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
It's a trivial simplification for get_next_ra_size and
clear enough for humans to understand.
It also fixes potential overflow if ra->size(< ra_pages) is too large.
Cc: Fengguang Wu
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang
---
mm/readahead.c | 12 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
12 matches
Mail list logo