Re: [PATCH] mm: simplify get_next_ra_size

2020-11-02 Thread The Dellia’s
Fuck off Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 2, 2020, at 11:01 AM, The Dellia’s wrote: > >  > > > Sent from my iPhone

Re: [PATCH] mm: simplify get_next_ra_size

2020-11-02 Thread The Dellia’s
Sent from my iPhone

Re: [PATCH] mm: simplify get_next_ra_size

2018-10-28 Thread Gao Xiang
Hi Matthew, On 2018/10/28 18:23, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 02:13:26PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: >> It's a trivial simplification for get_next_ra_size and >> clear enough for humans to understand. >> >> It also fixes potential overflow if ra->size(< ra_pages) is too large. >>

Re: [PATCH] mm: simplify get_next_ra_size

2018-10-28 Thread Gao Xiang
Hi Matthew, On 2018/10/28 18:23, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 02:13:26PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: >> It's a trivial simplification for get_next_ra_size and >> clear enough for humans to understand. >> >> It also fixes potential overflow if ra->size(< ra_pages) is too large. >>

Re: [PATCH] mm: simplify get_next_ra_size

2018-10-28 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 02:13:26PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > It's a trivial simplification for get_next_ra_size and > clear enough for humans to understand. > > It also fixes potential overflow if ra->size(< ra_pages) is too large. > > Cc: Fengguang Wu > Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang Reviewed-by:

Re: [PATCH] mm: simplify get_next_ra_size

2018-10-28 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 02:13:26PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > It's a trivial simplification for get_next_ra_size and > clear enough for humans to understand. > > It also fixes potential overflow if ra->size(< ra_pages) is too large. > > Cc: Fengguang Wu > Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang Reviewed-by:

Re: [PATCH] mm: simplify get_next_ra_size

2018-10-28 Thread Gao Xiang
Hi Fengguang, On 2018/10/28 14:27, Fengguang Wu wrote: > Looks good to me, thanks! > > Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu  Thanks for taking time and the quickly review. :) Best regards, Gao Xiang > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 02:13:26PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: >> It's a trivial simplification for 

Re: [PATCH] mm: simplify get_next_ra_size

2018-10-28 Thread Gao Xiang
Hi Fengguang, On 2018/10/28 14:27, Fengguang Wu wrote: > Looks good to me, thanks! > > Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu  Thanks for taking time and the quickly review. :) Best regards, Gao Xiang > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 02:13:26PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: >> It's a trivial simplification for 

Re: [PATCH] mm: simplify get_next_ra_size

2018-10-28 Thread Fengguang Wu
Looks good to me, thanks! Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 02:13:26PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: It's a trivial simplification for get_next_ra_size and clear enough for humans to understand. It also fixes potential overflow if ra->size(< ra_pages) is too large. Cc: Fengguang

Re: [PATCH] mm: simplify get_next_ra_size

2018-10-28 Thread Fengguang Wu
Looks good to me, thanks! Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 02:13:26PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: It's a trivial simplification for get_next_ra_size and clear enough for humans to understand. It also fixes potential overflow if ra->size(< ra_pages) is too large. Cc: Fengguang

[PATCH] mm: simplify get_next_ra_size

2018-10-28 Thread Gao Xiang
It's a trivial simplification for get_next_ra_size and clear enough for humans to understand. It also fixes potential overflow if ra->size(< ra_pages) is too large. Cc: Fengguang Wu Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang --- mm/readahead.c | 12 +--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

[PATCH] mm: simplify get_next_ra_size

2018-10-28 Thread Gao Xiang
It's a trivial simplification for get_next_ra_size and clear enough for humans to understand. It also fixes potential overflow if ra->size(< ra_pages) is too large. Cc: Fengguang Wu Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang --- mm/readahead.c | 12 +--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)