Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

On 10 March 2016 at 11:30, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > It was impossible to wake-up on card detect event because when sdhci > controller is runtime suspend, it is assumed that all the clocks are > disabled so we can't get irqs. > If the device is removable and there is

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

On 10 March 2016 at 11:30, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > It was impossible to wake-up on card detect event because when sdhci > controller is runtime suspend, it is assumed that all the clocks are > disabled so we can't get irqs. > If the device is removable and there is no gpio to manage the card >

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:30:58AM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > It was impossible to wake-up on card detect event because when sdhci > controller is runtime suspend, it is assumed that all the clocks are > disabled so we can't get irqs. > If the device is removable and there is no gpio to

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:30:58AM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > It was impossible to wake-up on card detect event because when sdhci > controller is runtime suspend, it is assumed that all the clocks are > disabled so we can't get irqs. > If the device is removable and there is no gpio to

[PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

It was impossible to wake-up on card detect event because when sdhci controller is runtime suspend, it is assumed that all the clocks are disabled so we can't get irqs. If the device is removable and there is no gpio to manage the card detection then card detection polling is used. Signed-off-by:

[PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

It was impossible to wake-up on card detect event because when sdhci controller is runtime suspend, it is assumed that all the clocks are disabled so we can't get irqs. If the device is removable and there is no gpio to manage the card detection then card detection polling is used. Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

+ PM mailing list since the discussion is mixing PM and sdhci On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 10:56:31PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > +Ludovic > > On 8 March 2016 at 22:54, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On 4 March 2016 at 14:48, Ludovic Desroches > >

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

+ PM mailing list since the discussion is mixing PM and sdhci On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 10:56:31PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > +Ludovic > > On 8 March 2016 at 22:54, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On 4 March 2016 at 14:48, Ludovic Desroches > > wrote: [snip] > >> > >> Coming back to the initial

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

+Ludovic On 8 March 2016 at 22:54, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 4 March 2016 at 14:48, Ludovic Desroches > wrote: >> Hi Ulf, >> >> On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 10:09:37AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>> On 17 February 2016 at 11:35, Ludovic Desroches >>

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

+Ludovic On 8 March 2016 at 22:54, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 4 March 2016 at 14:48, Ludovic Desroches > wrote: >> Hi Ulf, >> >> On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 10:09:37AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>> On 17 February 2016 at 11:35, Ludovic Desroches >> >> [snip] >> >>> > I am wondering if I should take

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

On 4 March 2016 at 14:48, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > Hi Ulf, > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 10:09:37AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> On 17 February 2016 at 11:35, Ludovic Desroches > > [snip] > >> > I am wondering if I should take account of sdio irq enabled or not here.

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

On 4 March 2016 at 14:48, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > Hi Ulf, > > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 10:09:37AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> On 17 February 2016 at 11:35, Ludovic Desroches > > [snip] > >> > I am wondering if I should take account of sdio irq enabled or not here. >> > >> > I have a sdio

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

Hi Ulf, On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 10:09:37AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 17 February 2016 at 11:35, Ludovic Desroches [snip] > > I am wondering if I should take account of sdio irq enabled or not here. > > > > I have a sdio device which drives me crazy because of power management. > > The

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

Hi Ulf, On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 10:09:37AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 17 February 2016 at 11:35, Ludovic Desroches [snip] > > I am wondering if I should take account of sdio irq enabled or not here. > > > > I have a sdio device which drives me crazy because of power management. > > The

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

+ Ludovic On 4 March 2016 at 10:09, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 17 February 2016 at 11:35, Ludovic Desroches > wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:22:04PM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:38:29PM +0100, Ulf Hansson

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

+ Ludovic On 4 March 2016 at 10:09, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 17 February 2016 at 11:35, Ludovic Desroches > wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:22:04PM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:38:29PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: >>> > On 13 February 2016 at 10:56, Ludovic

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

On 17 February 2016 at 11:35, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:22:04PM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:38:29PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> > On 13 February 2016 at 10:56, Ludovic Desroches >> >

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

On 17 February 2016 at 11:35, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:22:04PM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:38:29PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> > On 13 February 2016 at 10:56, Ludovic Desroches >> > wrote: >> > > When suspending the sdhci host, the

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 10:56:40AM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > When suspending the sdhci host, the only hardware event that could wake > up the host is a sdio irq if they are enabled. If we want to wakeup on > card detect events, a gpio as to be used. > If we don't want to use a gpio but the

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 10:56:40AM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > When suspending the sdhci host, the only hardware event that could wake > up the host is a sdio irq if they are enabled. If we want to wakeup on > card detect events, a gpio as to be used. > If we don't want to use a gpio but the

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:22:04PM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:38:29PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On 13 February 2016 at 10:56, Ludovic Desroches > > wrote: > > > When suspending the sdhci host, the only hardware event that could

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:22:04PM +0100, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:38:29PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On 13 February 2016 at 10:56, Ludovic Desroches > > wrote: > > > When suspending the sdhci host, the only hardware event that could wake > > > up the host is a

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:38:29PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 13 February 2016 at 10:56, Ludovic Desroches > wrote: > > When suspending the sdhci host, the only hardware event that could wake > > up the host is a sdio irq if they are enabled. If we want to wakeup

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 03:38:29PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 13 February 2016 at 10:56, Ludovic Desroches > wrote: > > When suspending the sdhci host, the only hardware event that could wake > > up the host is a sdio irq if they are enabled. If we want to wakeup on > > card detect events, a

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

On 13 February 2016 at 10:56, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > When suspending the sdhci host, the only hardware event that could wake > up the host is a sdio irq if they are enabled. If we want to wakeup on > card detect events, a gpio as to be used. > If we don't want to

Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

On 13 February 2016 at 10:56, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > When suspending the sdhci host, the only hardware event that could wake > up the host is a sdio irq if they are enabled. If we want to wakeup on > card detect events, a gpio as to be used. > If we don't want to use a gpio but the card

[PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

When suspending the sdhci host, the only hardware event that could wake up the host is a sdio irq if they are enabled. If we want to wakeup on card detect events, a gpio as to be used. If we don't want to use a gpio but the card detect pio of the controller then we need to keep enabled the clock

[PATCH] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: fix wakeup issue when using runtime pm

When suspending the sdhci host, the only hardware event that could wake up the host is a sdio irq if they are enabled. If we want to wakeup on card detect events, a gpio as to be used. If we don't want to use a gpio but the card detect pio of the controller then we need to keep enabled the clock