Steven Rostedt writes:
> On Thu, 02 Mar 2017 22:18:30 +1100
> Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Michael Ellerman writes:
>> > David Daney writes:
>> >> Strict alignment became necessary with commit 3821fd35b58d
>> >> ("jump_label: Reduce the size of struct static_key"), currently in
>> >> linux-next
+++ David Daney [02/03/17 11:24 -0800]:
On 03/02/2017 10:26 AM, Jessica Yu wrote:
+++ Steven Rostedt [02/03/17 13:11 -0500]:
Can I get an Ack from a module maintainer?
Acked-by: Jessica Yu
Thanks!
Jessica
Thanks Jessica,
Can you also add scripts/module-common.lds to MAINTAINERS so that
On 03/02/2017 10:26 AM, Jessica Yu wrote:
+++ Steven Rostedt [02/03/17 13:11 -0500]:
Can I get an Ack from a module maintainer?
Acked-by: Jessica Yu
Thanks!
Jessica
Thanks Jessica,
Can you also add scripts/module-common.lds to MAINTAINERS so that
get_maintainers.pl will indicate that J
+++ Steven Rostedt [02/03/17 13:11 -0500]:
Can I get an Ack from a module maintainer?
Acked-by: Jessica Yu
Thanks!
Jessica
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 14:04:53 -0800
David Daney wrote:
For powerpc the __jump_table section in modules is not aligned, this
causes a WARN_ON() splat when loading a
Can I get an Ack from a module maintainer?
Thanks!
-- Steve
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 14:04:53 -0800
David Daney wrote:
> For powerpc the __jump_table section in modules is not aligned, this
> causes a WARN_ON() splat when loading a module containing a __jump_table.
>
> Strict alignment became ne
On Thu, 02 Mar 2017 22:18:30 +1100
Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Michael Ellerman writes:
> > David Daney writes:
> >> Strict alignment became necessary with commit 3821fd35b58d
> >> ("jump_label: Reduce the size of struct static_key"), currently in
> >> linux-next, which uses the two least signi
On 03/01/2017 05:04 PM, David Daney wrote:
For powerpc the __jump_table section in modules is not aligned, this
causes a WARN_ON() splat when loading a module containing a __jump_table.
Strict alignment became necessary with commit 3821fd35b58d
("jump_label: Reduce the size of struct static_key"
Michael Ellerman writes:
> David Daney writes:
>> Strict alignment became necessary with commit 3821fd35b58d
>> ("jump_label: Reduce the size of struct static_key"), currently in
>> linux-next, which uses the two least significant bits of pointers to
>> __jump_table elements.
>
> It would obvious
David Daney writes:
> For powerpc the __jump_table section in modules is not aligned, this
> causes a WARN_ON() splat when loading a module containing a __jump_table.
Thanks for doing the patch.
If it helps:
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman (powerpc)
> Strict alignment became necessary with commit
For powerpc the __jump_table section in modules is not aligned, this
causes a WARN_ON() splat when loading a module containing a __jump_table.
Strict alignment became necessary with commit 3821fd35b58d
("jump_label: Reduce the size of struct static_key"), currently in
linux-next, which uses the tw
10 matches
Mail list logo