On 12/27/16 12:03 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Wei Zhang
> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 17:52:24 +0800
>
>> When we send a packet for our own local address on a non-loopback
>> interface (e.g. eth0), due to the change had been introduced from
>> commit 0b922b7a829c ("net:
On 12/27/16 12:03 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Wei Zhang
> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 17:52:24 +0800
>
>> When we send a packet for our own local address on a non-loopback
>> interface (e.g. eth0), due to the change had been introduced from
>> commit 0b922b7a829c ("net: original ingress device
From: Wei Zhang
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 17:52:24 +0800
> When we send a packet for our own local address on a non-loopback
> interface (e.g. eth0), due to the change had been introduced from
> commit 0b922b7a829c ("net: original ingress device index in PKTINFO"), the
> original
From: Wei Zhang
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 17:52:24 +0800
> When we send a packet for our own local address on a non-loopback
> interface (e.g. eth0), due to the change had been introduced from
> commit 0b922b7a829c ("net: original ingress device index in PKTINFO"), the
> original ingress device
Hello!
On 12/27/2016 10:52 AM, Wei Zhang wrote:
When we send a packet for our own local address on a non-loopback interface
(e.g. eth0), due to the change had been introduced from commit 0b922b7a829c
("net: original ingress device index in PKTINFO"), the original ingress
device index would be
Hello!
On 12/27/2016 10:52 AM, Wei Zhang wrote:
When we send a packet for our own local address on a non-loopback interface
(e.g. eth0), due to the change had been introduced from commit 0b922b7a829c
("net: original ingress device index in PKTINFO"), the original ingress
device index would be
When we send a packet for our own local address on a non-loopback
interface (e.g. eth0), due to the change had been introduced from
commit 0b922b7a829c ("net: original ingress device index in PKTINFO"), the
original ingress device index would be set as the loopback interface.
However, the packet
When we send a packet for our own local address on a non-loopback
interface (e.g. eth0), due to the change had been introduced from
commit 0b922b7a829c ("net: original ingress device index in PKTINFO"), the
original ingress device index would be set as the loopback interface.
However, the packet
At 2016-12-27 15:52:18, "Wei Zhang" wrote:
>When we send a packet for our own local address on a non-loopback interface
>(e.g. eth0), due to the change had been introduced from commit 0b922b7a829c
>("net: original ingress device index in PKTINFO"), the original ingress
>device
At 2016-12-27 15:52:18, "Wei Zhang" wrote:
>When we send a packet for our own local address on a non-loopback interface
>(e.g. eth0), due to the change had been introduced from commit 0b922b7a829c
>("net: original ingress device index in PKTINFO"), the original ingress
>device index would be set
When we send a packet for our own local address on a non-loopback interface
(e.g. eth0), due to the change had been introduced from commit 0b922b7a829c
("net: original ingress device index in PKTINFO"), the original ingress
device index would be set as the loopback interface. However, the packet
When we send a packet for our own local address on a non-loopback interface
(e.g. eth0), due to the change had been introduced from commit 0b922b7a829c
("net: original ingress device index in PKTINFO"), the original ingress
device index would be set as the loopback interface. However, the packet
12 matches
Mail list logo