On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 1:11 PM Daniel Lezcano
wrote:
>
> The generic netlink is initialized far after the netlink protocol
> itself at subsys_initcall. The devlink is initialized at the same
> level, but after, as shown by a disassembly of the vmlinux:
>
> [ ... ]
> 374 8000115f22c0
Hi
On 15.07.2020 09:41, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The generic netlink is initialized far after the netlink protocol
> itself at subsys_initcall. The devlink is initialized at the same
> level, but after, as shown by a disassembly of the vmlinux:
>
> [ ... ]
> 374 8000115f22c0
On 17/07/2020 19:34, David Miller wrote:
> From: Daniel Lezcano
> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:43:00 +0200
>
>> if you agree with this change, is it possible I merge it through the
>> thermal tree in order to fix the issue ?
>
> No problem:
>
> Acked-by: David S. Miller
Thanks!
--
From: Daniel Lezcano
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:43:00 +0200
> if you agree with this change, is it possible I merge it through the
> thermal tree in order to fix the issue ?
No problem:
Acked-by: David S. Miller
Hi Dave,
if you agree with this change, is it possible I merge it through the
thermal tree in order to fix the issue ?
Thanks
-- Daniel
On 15/07/2020 09:41, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The generic netlink is initialized far after the netlink protocol
> itself at subsys_initcall. The devlink
The generic netlink is initialized far after the netlink protocol
itself at subsys_initcall. The devlink is initialized at the same
level, but after, as shown by a disassembly of the vmlinux:
[ ... ]
374 8000115f22c0 <__initcall_devlink_init4>:
375 8000115f22c4 <__initcall_genl_init4>:
[
6 matches
Mail list logo
