Re: [PATCH] net: ks8851: Don't use regulator_get_optional()

2014-06-01 Thread David Miller
From: Stephen Boyd Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 13:11:12 -0700 > We shouldn't be using regulator_get_optional() here. These > regulators are always present as part of the physical design and > there isn't any way to use an internal regulator or change the > source of the reference voltage via software.

Re: [PATCH] net: ks8851: Don't use regulator_get_optional()

2014-05-29 Thread Nishanth Menon
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > We shouldn't be using regulator_get_optional() here. These > regulators are always present as part of the physical design and > there isn't any way to use an internal regulator or change the > source of the reference voltage via software. Give

Re: [PATCH] net: ks8851: Don't use regulator_get_optional()

2014-05-28 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 01:11:12PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > We shouldn't be using regulator_get_optional() here. These > regulators are always present as part of the physical design and > there isn't any way to use an internal regulator or change the > source of the reference voltage via softwa

[PATCH] net: ks8851: Don't use regulator_get_optional()

2014-05-28 Thread Stephen Boyd
We shouldn't be using regulator_get_optional() here. These regulators are always present as part of the physical design and there isn't any way to use an internal regulator or change the source of the reference voltage via software. Given that the only users of this driver in the kernel are DT base