From: Tony Camuso
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 09:09:18 -0400
> This patch should have been part of the previous patch having the
> same summary. See http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=143039470103795=2
> Unfortunately, I didn't check to see where else this lock was used before
> submitting that patch.
From: Tony Camuso tcam...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 09:09:18 -0400
This patch should have been part of the previous patch having the
same summary. See http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=143039470103795w=2
Unfortunately, I didn't check to see where else this lock was used before
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Camuso [mailto:tcam...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 6:39 PM
> To: linux-kernel; netdev
> Cc: Manish Chopra; Sony Chacko; Rajesh Borundia; nhor...@redhat.com
> Subject: [PATCH] netxen_nic: use spin_[un]lock_bh aroun
-Original Message-
From: Tony Camuso [mailto:tcam...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 6:39 PM
To: linux-kernel; netdev
Cc: Manish Chopra; Sony Chacko; Rajesh Borundia; nhor...@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] netxen_nic: use spin_[un]lock_bh around tx_clean_lock (2)
This patch
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 09:09:18AM -0400, Tony Camuso wrote:
> This patch should have been part of the previous patch having the
> same summary. See http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=143039470103795=2
> Unfortunately, I didn't check to see where else this lock was used before
> submitting that
This patch should have been part of the previous patch having the
same summary. See http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=143039470103795=2
Unfortunately, I didn't check to see where else this lock was used before
submitting that patch. This should take care of it for netxen_nic, as I
did a thorough
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 09:09:18AM -0400, Tony Camuso wrote:
This patch should have been part of the previous patch having the
same summary. See http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=143039470103795w=2
Unfortunately, I didn't check to see where else this lock was used before
submitting that
This patch should have been part of the previous patch having the
same summary. See http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=143039470103795w=2
Unfortunately, I didn't check to see where else this lock was used before
submitting that patch. This should take care of it for netxen_nic, as I
did a thorough
8 matches
Mail list logo