On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 22:55 -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> It used to be the case that state had an rwlock that was locked for write
> by downgrades, but for read for upgrades (opens). Well, the problem is
> if there are two competing opens for the same state, they step on
> each other toes
On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 22:55 -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> It used to be the case that state had an rwlock that was locked for write
> by downgrades, but for read for upgrades (opens). Well, the problem is
> if there are two competing opens for the same state, they step on
> each other toes
It used to be the case that state had an rwlock that was locked for write
by downgrades, but for read for upgrades (opens). Well, the problem is
if there are two competing opens for the same state, they step on
each other toes potentially leading to leaking file descriptors
from the state
It used to be the case that state had an rwlock that was locked for write
by downgrades, but for read for upgrades (opens). Well, the problem is
if there are two competing opens for the same state, they step on
each other toes potentially leading to leaking file descriptors
from the state
4 matches
Mail list logo
