On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 1:20 AM, James Bottomley
wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 22:25 -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:03 PM, James Bottomley
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 16:37 -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>> >> The comment for size of frame not being needed is
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 22:25 -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:03 PM, James Bottomley
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 16:37 -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> >> The comment for size of frame not being needed is incorrect , the
> >> function called needs this parameter.
> >
> >
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:03 PM, James Bottomley
wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 16:37 -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>> The comment for size of frame not being needed is incorrect , the
>> function called needs this parameter.
>
> Actually, that's not correct. The point of the FIXME is that
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 16:37 -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> The comment for size of frame not being needed is incorrect , the
> function called needs this parameter.
Actually, that's not correct. The point of the FIXME is that fram_size
is only used in a debug print and could be eliminated since
On 07/18/2014 10:37 PM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> The comment for size of frame not being needed is incorrect , the
> function called needs this parameter.
Thanks for the patch Nicholas.
It has been queued up:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4587631/
and
The comment for size of frame not being needed is incorrect , the
function called needs this parameter.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause
---
arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c
index
The comment for size of frame not being needed is incorrect , the
function called needs this parameter.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause xerofo...@gmail.com
---
arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/signal.c
On 07/18/2014 10:37 PM, Nicholas Krause wrote:
The comment for size of frame not being needed is incorrect , the
function called needs this parameter.
Thanks for the patch Nicholas.
It has been queued up:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4587631/
and
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 16:37 -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
The comment for size of frame not being needed is incorrect , the
function called needs this parameter.
Actually, that's not correct. The point of the FIXME is that fram_size
is only used in a debug print and could be eliminated since
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:03 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 16:37 -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
The comment for size of frame not being needed is incorrect , the
function called needs this parameter.
Actually, that's not correct. The
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 22:25 -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:03 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 16:37 -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
The comment for size of frame not being needed is incorrect , the
function called
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 1:20 AM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 22:25 -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:03 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-07-18 at 16:37 -0400, Nicholas Krause
12 matches
Mail list logo
