On 27.04.2016 03:56, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> Do not load one entry beyond the end of the syscall table when the
> syscall number of a traced process equals to __NR_Linux_syscalls.
> Similar bug with regular processes was fixed by commit 3bb457af4fa8
> ("[PARISC] Fix bug when syscall nr is __NR_Lin
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:45:11PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 27 Apr 2016 04:56, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > Do not load one entry beyond the end of the syscall table when the
> > syscall number of a traced process equals to __NR_Linux_syscalls.
> > Similar bug with regular processes was fixe
On 27 Apr 2016 04:56, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> Do not load one entry beyond the end of the syscall table when the
> syscall number of a traced process equals to __NR_Linux_syscalls.
> Similar bug with regular processes was fixed by commit 3bb457af4fa8
> ("[PARISC] Fix bug when syscall nr is __NR_Li
Do not load one entry beyond the end of the syscall table when the
syscall number of a traced process equals to __NR_Linux_syscalls.
Similar bug with regular processes was fixed by commit 3bb457af4fa8
("[PARISC] Fix bug when syscall nr is __NR_Linux_syscalls").
This bug was found by strace test su
4 matches
Mail list logo