Em Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:08:59PM -0700, David Miller escreveu:
>
> Using the sh_entsize for both values isn't correct. It happens
> to be correct on x86...
>
> For both 32-bit and 64-bit sparc, there are four PLT entries in the
> PLT section.
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
Em Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:08:59PM -0700, David Miller escreveu:
>
> Using the sh_entsize for both values isn't correct. It happens
> to be correct on x86...
>
> For both 32-bit and 64-bit sparc, there are four PLT entries in the
> PLT section.
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
Using the sh_entsize for both values isn't correct. It happens
to be correct on x86...
For both 32-bit and 64-bit sparc, there are four PLT entries in the
PLT section.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
---
tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1
Using the sh_entsize for both values isn't correct. It happens
to be correct on x86...
For both 32-bit and 64-bit sparc, there are four PLT entries in the
PLT section.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
---
tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1
4 matches
Mail list logo