Hi David,
2013-07-09 오후 11:21, David Ahern 쓴 글:
On 7/9/13 1:41 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Arnaldo,
You may want to merge this patch too. :)
He did. See 77d03596 and the note:
[ combined patch removing the -f usage in various sub-commands, such
as 'perf sched', etc, by Namhyung Kim ]
On 7/9/13 1:41 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Arnaldo,
You may want to merge this patch too. :)
He did. See 77d03596 and the note:
[ combined patch removing the -f usage in various sub-commands, such
as 'perf sched', etc, by Namhyung Kim ]
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Hi Arnaldo,
You may want to merge this patch too. :)
Thanks,
Namhyung
2013-06-27 오후 1:25, Namhyung Kim 쓴 글:
From: Namhyung Kim
The commit bf3da4014a0c ("perf record: Remove -f/--force option") got
rid of -f option from perf record. But this option was used
internally by various
Hi David,
2013-07-09 오후 11:21, David Ahern 쓴 글:
On 7/9/13 1:41 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Arnaldo,
You may want to merge this patch too. :)
He did. See 77d03596 and the note:
[ combined patch removing the -f usage in various sub-commands, such
as 'perf sched', etc, by Namhyung Kim ]
Hi Arnaldo,
You may want to merge this patch too. :)
Thanks,
Namhyung
2013-06-27 오후 1:25, Namhyung Kim 쓴 글:
From: Namhyung Kim namhyung@lge.com
The commit bf3da4014a0c (perf record: Remove -f/--force option) got
rid of -f option from perf record. But this option was used
internally by
On 7/9/13 1:41 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Arnaldo,
You may want to merge this patch too. :)
He did. See 77d03596 and the note:
[ combined patch removing the -f usage in various sub-commands, such
as 'perf sched', etc, by Namhyung Kim ]
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
* David Ahern wrote:
> On 6/28/13 9:37 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >* David Ahern wrote:
> >
> >>On 6/28/13 3:47 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >I thought -f was the implied default for ages?
>
> OK.. I've been dutifully typing it all this while :-)
> >>>
> >>>The '-f' option in record
On 6/28/13 9:37 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* David Ahern wrote:
On 6/28/13 3:47 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
I thought -f was the implied default for ages?
OK.. I've been dutifully typing it all this while :-)
The '-f' option in record command had no affect.. myabe it got
depreceated when we
* David Ahern wrote:
> On 6/28/13 3:47 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >>>I thought -f was the implied default for ages?
> >>
> >>OK.. I've been dutifully typing it all this while :-)
> >
> >The '-f' option in record command had no affect.. myabe it got
> >depreceated when we started to backup perf.data
On 6/28/13 3:47 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
I thought -f was the implied default for ages?
OK.. I've been dutifully typing it all this while :-)
The '-f' option in record command had no affect.. myabe it got
depreceated when we started to backup perf.data to perf.data.old..?
Way back in 2010,
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:47:50PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:39:31PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:25:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > > From: Namhyung Kim
> > > >
> > > > The commit
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:47:50PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:39:31PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:25:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
From: Namhyung Kim namhyung@lge.com
On 6/28/13 3:47 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
I thought -f was the implied default for ages?
OK.. I've been dutifully typing it all this while :-)
The '-f' option in record command had no affect.. myabe it got
depreceated when we started to backup perf.data to perf.data.old..?
Way back in 2010,
* David Ahern dsah...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/28/13 3:47 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
I thought -f was the implied default for ages?
OK.. I've been dutifully typing it all this while :-)
The '-f' option in record command had no affect.. myabe it got
depreceated when we started to backup perf.data
On 6/28/13 9:37 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* David Ahern dsah...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/28/13 3:47 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
I thought -f was the implied default for ages?
OK.. I've been dutifully typing it all this while :-)
The '-f' option in record command had no affect.. myabe it got
* David Ahern dsah...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/28/13 9:37 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* David Ahern dsah...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/28/13 3:47 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
I thought -f was the implied default for ages?
OK.. I've been dutifully typing it all this while :-)
The '-f' option in record
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:39:31PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:25:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > From: Namhyung Kim
> > >
> > > The commit bf3da4014a0c ("perf record: Remove -f/--force option") got
> > > rid of -f option from
* Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:25:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > From: Namhyung Kim
> >
> > The commit bf3da4014a0c ("perf record: Remove -f/--force option") got
> > rid of -f option from perf record. But this option was used
> > internally by various sub-commands
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:25:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> From: Namhyung Kim
>
> The commit bf3da4014a0c ("perf record: Remove -f/--force option") got
> rid of -f option from perf record. But this option was used
> internally by various sub-commands so they wouldn't work anymore.
> Also
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:25:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
From: Namhyung Kim namhyung@lge.com
The commit bf3da4014a0c (perf record: Remove -f/--force option) got
rid of -f option from perf record. But this option was used
internally by various sub-commands so they wouldn't work
* Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:25:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
From: Namhyung Kim namhyung@lge.com
The commit bf3da4014a0c (perf record: Remove -f/--force option) got
rid of -f option from perf record. But this option was used
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:39:31PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Peter Zijlstra pet...@infradead.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:25:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
From: Namhyung Kim namhyung@lge.com
The commit bf3da4014a0c (perf record: Remove -f/--force option) got
From: Namhyung Kim
The commit bf3da4014a0c ("perf record: Remove -f/--force option") got
rid of -f option from perf record. But this option was used
internally by various sub-commands so they wouldn't work anymore.
Also update the example document not to use -f option.
Cc: Jiri Olsa
From: Namhyung Kim namhyung@lge.com
The commit bf3da4014a0c (perf record: Remove -f/--force option) got
rid of -f option from perf record. But this option was used
internally by various sub-commands so they wouldn't work anymore.
Also update the example document not to use -f option.
Cc:
24 matches
Mail list logo