Re: [PATCH] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: Fix off-by-one valid value checking for args->args[0]

Hi, On Friday, February 27, 2015 9:14 PM "Axel Lin" wrote: Current code uses args->args[0] as array subscript of phy_drd->phys[]. So the valid value range for args->args[0] is 0 ... EXYNOS5_DRDPHYS_NUM - 1. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin Reviewed by: Vivek Gautam ---

Re: [PATCH] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: Fix off-by-one valid value checking for args-args[0]

Hi, On Friday, February 27, 2015 9:14 PM Axel Lin axel@ingics.com wrote: Current code uses args-args[0] as array subscript of phy_drd-phys[]. So the valid value range for args-args[0] is 0 ... EXYNOS5_DRDPHYS_NUM - 1. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin axel@ingics.com Reviewed by: Vivek

[PATCH] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: Fix off-by-one valid value checking for args->args[0]

Current code uses args->args[0] as array subscript of phy_drd->phys[]. So the valid value range for args->args[0] is 0 ... EXYNOS5_DRDPHYS_NUM - 1. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin --- drivers/phy/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

[PATCH] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: Fix off-by-one valid value checking for args-args[0]

Current code uses args-args[0] as array subscript of phy_drd-phys[]. So the valid value range for args-args[0] is 0 ... EXYNOS5_DRDPHYS_NUM - 1. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin axel@ingics.com --- drivers/phy/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git