Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: add params in disable_setting for different usage

2014-05-23 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * FanWu [140520 23:23]: >> To remove the HW disable function in pinmux_disable_setting is no effect for >> our SoC platform. I am just not sure whether it has effect for other >> platform just as I described before. >> If there is no vendor

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: add params in disable_setting for different usage

2014-05-21 Thread Tony Lindgren
* FanWu [140520 23:23]: > To remove the HW disable function in pinmux_disable_setting is no effect for > our SoC platform. I am just not sure whether it has effect for other > platform just as I described before. > If there is no vendor using the HW disabling operation, I also agree to > remove th

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: add params in disable_setting for different usage

2014-05-20 Thread FanWu
On 05/21/2014 02:42 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 05/19/2014 09:05 PM, FanWu wrote: On 05/20/2014 04:55 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 05/18/2014 08:54 PM, FanWu wrote: On 05/17/2014 03:53 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 05/16/2014 10:21 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:01 AM,

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: add params in disable_setting for different usage

2014-05-20 Thread Stephen Warren
On 05/19/2014 09:05 PM, FanWu wrote: > On 05/20/2014 04:55 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 05/18/2014 08:54 PM, FanWu wrote: >>> On 05/17/2014 03:53 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 05/16/2014 10:21 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:01 AM, wrote: > >> From: Fan Wu

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: add params in disable_setting for different usage

2014-05-19 Thread FanWu
On 05/20/2014 04:55 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 05/18/2014 08:54 PM, FanWu wrote: On 05/17/2014 03:53 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 05/16/2014 10:21 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:01 AM, wrote: From: Fan Wu The patch added params in disable_setting to differ the two p

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: add params in disable_setting for different usage

2014-05-19 Thread Stephen Warren
On 05/18/2014 08:54 PM, FanWu wrote: > On 05/17/2014 03:53 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 05/16/2014 10:21 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: >>> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:01 AM, wrote: >>> From: Fan Wu The patch added params in disable_setting to differ the two possible usage, 1

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: add params in disable_setting for different usage

2014-05-18 Thread FanWu
On 05/17/2014 03:53 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 05/16/2014 10:21 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:01 AM, wrote: From: Fan Wu The patch added params in disable_setting to differ the two possible usage, 1.Only want to disable the pin setting in SW aspect, param can be set

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: add params in disable_setting for different usage

2014-05-16 Thread Stephen Warren
On 05/16/2014 10:21 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:01 AM, wrote: > >> From: Fan Wu >> >> The patch added params in disable_setting to differ the two possible usage, >> 1.Only want to disable the pin setting in SW aspect, param can be set to "0" >> 2.Want to disable the pin

Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: add params in disable_setting for different usage

2014-05-16 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:01 AM, wrote: > From: Fan Wu > > The patch added params in disable_setting to differ the two possible usage, > 1.Only want to disable the pin setting in SW aspect, param can be set to "0" > 2.Want to disable the pin setting in both HW and SW aspect, param can be set >

[PATCH] pinctrl: add params in disable_setting for different usage

2014-05-13 Thread fwu
From: Fan Wu The patch added params in disable_setting to differ the two possible usage, 1.Only want to disable the pin setting in SW aspect, param can be set to "0" 2.Want to disable the pin setting in both HW and SW aspect, param can be set to "1"; The reason why to do this is that: To avoid