On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
> If nobody is opposed to this, I can send a single big patch
> replacing all the references.
>
> In that case, we would not need _strict().
Yeah just do this.
> My concern is the sudden change of the function interface
> will break
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Masahiro Yamada
yamada.masah...@socionext.com wrote:
If nobody is opposed to this, I can send a single big patch
replacing all the references.
In that case, we would not need _strict().
Yeah just do this.
My concern is the sudden change of the function
Hi Linus,
2015-06-02 21:56 GMT+09:00 Linus Walleij :
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Masahiro Yamada
> wrote:
>
>> The pinctrl_register() just returns NULL on error, so the callers
>> can not know the exact reason of the failure.
>>
>> Some of the pinctrl drivers return -EINVAL, some
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
> The pinctrl_register() just returns NULL on error, so the callers
> can not know the exact reason of the failure.
>
> Some of the pinctrl drivers return -EINVAL, some -ENODEV, and some
> -ENOMEM on error of pinctrl_register() , although
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Masahiro Yamada
yamada.masah...@socionext.com wrote:
The pinctrl_register() just returns NULL on error, so the callers
can not know the exact reason of the failure.
Some of the pinctrl drivers return -EINVAL, some -ENODEV, and some
-ENOMEM on error of
Hi Linus,
2015-06-02 21:56 GMT+09:00 Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Masahiro Yamada
yamada.masah...@socionext.com wrote:
The pinctrl_register() just returns NULL on error, so the callers
can not know the exact reason of the failure.
Some of the
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 08:30PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> The pinctrl_register() just returns NULL on error, so the callers
> can not know the exact reason of the failure.
>
> Some of the pinctrl drivers return -EINVAL, some -ENODEV, and some
> -ENOMEM on error of pinctrl_register() ,
The pinctrl_register() just returns NULL on error, so the callers
can not know the exact reason of the failure.
Some of the pinctrl drivers return -EINVAL, some -ENODEV, and some
-ENOMEM on error of pinctrl_register() , although the error code
might be different from the actual cause of the
The pinctrl_register() just returns NULL on error, so the callers
can not know the exact reason of the failure.
Some of the pinctrl drivers return -EINVAL, some -ENODEV, and some
-ENOMEM on error of pinctrl_register() , although the error code
might be different from the actual cause of the
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 08:30PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
The pinctrl_register() just returns NULL on error, so the callers
can not know the exact reason of the failure.
Some of the pinctrl drivers return -EINVAL, some -ENODEV, and some
-ENOMEM on error of pinctrl_register() , although the
10 matches
Mail list logo