On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:02:14AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 3:39 AM Bjorn Andersson
> wrote:
>
> > @Linus, we started off with something similar for GPIOs and ended up
> > with the logic in the core code. Should we somehow try to do the same
> > for pinctrl?
>
>
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 3:39 AM Bjorn Andersson
wrote:
> @Linus, we started off with something similar for GPIOs and ended up
> with the logic in the core code. Should we somehow try to do the same
> for pinctrl?
msm_pingroup_is_valid() looks very reusable but I'm afraid I do not
understand the
O Mon, May 18, 2020 at 06:38:13PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 18 May 08:50 PDT 2020, Mayank Grover wrote:
>
> > The list of reserved gpio pins for platform are populated
> > in gpiochip valid_mask.
> >
> > Here on MSM common driver introduce ability to check if
> > pingroup is valid,
On Mon 18 May 08:50 PDT 2020, Mayank Grover wrote:
> The list of reserved gpio pins for platform are populated
> in gpiochip valid_mask.
>
> Here on MSM common driver introduce ability to check if
> pingroup is valid, by parsing pins in pingroup against
> reserved pins for gpios. This does not
The list of reserved gpio pins for platform are populated
in gpiochip valid_mask.
Here on MSM common driver introduce ability to check if
pingroup is valid, by parsing pins in pingroup against
reserved pins for gpios. This does not handle non-gpio
pingroups.
Signed-off-by: Mayank Grover
---
5 matches
Mail list logo