On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 06:01:20PM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Fine by me.
>
> Acked-by: Andres Salomon
>
> On Mon, 15
> Aug 2016 18:25:17 -0400 Paul Gortmaker
> wrote:
>
> > The Kconfig entry controlling compilation of this code is:
> >
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 06:01:20PM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Fine by me.
>
> Acked-by: Andres Salomon
>
> On Mon, 15
> Aug 2016 18:25:17 -0400 Paul Gortmaker
> wrote:
>
> > The Kconfig entry controlling compilation of this code is:
> >
> > arch/x86/Kconfig:config OLPC
> >
Fine by me.
Acked-by: Andres Salomon
On Mon, 15
Aug 2016 18:25:17 -0400 Paul Gortmaker
wrote:
> The Kconfig entry controlling compilation of this code is:
>
> arch/x86/Kconfig:config OLPC
> arch/x86/Kconfig: bool "One Laptop Per Child
Fine by me.
Acked-by: Andres Salomon
On Mon, 15
Aug 2016 18:25:17 -0400 Paul Gortmaker
wrote:
> The Kconfig entry controlling compilation of this code is:
>
> arch/x86/Kconfig:config OLPC
> arch/x86/Kconfig: bool "One Laptop Per Child support"
>
> ...meaning that it currently is not
The Kconfig entry controlling compilation of this code is:
arch/x86/Kconfig:config OLPC
arch/x86/Kconfig: bool "One Laptop Per Child support"
...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
Lets remove the couple traces of modular infrastructure use, so that
when
The Kconfig entry controlling compilation of this code is:
arch/x86/Kconfig:config OLPC
arch/x86/Kconfig: bool "One Laptop Per Child support"
...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
Lets remove the couple traces of modular infrastructure use, so that
when
6 matches
Mail list logo