Re: [PATCH] printk: rename vprintk_func to vprintk

2021-03-30 Thread Petr Mladek
On Tue 2021-03-30 14:59:31, John Ogness wrote: > On 2021-03-30, Petr Mladek wrote: > > On Tue 2021-03-23 15:42:01, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > >> The printk code is already hard enough to understand. Remove an > >> unnecessary indirection by renaming vprintk_func to vprintk (adding > >> the

Re: [PATCH] printk: rename vprintk_func to vprintk

2021-03-30 Thread John Ogness
On 2021-03-30, Petr Mladek wrote: > On Tue 2021-03-23 15:42:01, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: >> The printk code is already hard enough to understand. Remove an >> unnecessary indirection by renaming vprintk_func to vprintk (adding >> the asmlinkage annotation), and removing the vprintk definition from

Re: [PATCH] printk: rename vprintk_func to vprintk

2021-03-30 Thread Petr Mladek
On Tue 2021-03-23 15:42:01, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > The printk code is already hard enough to understand. Remove an > unnecessary indirection by renaming vprintk_func to vprintk (adding > the asmlinkage annotation), and removing the vprintk definition from > printk.c. That way, printk is

Re: [PATCH] printk: rename vprintk_func to vprintk

2021-03-24 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:42:01 +0100 Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > The printk code is already hard enough to understand. Remove an > unnecessary indirection by renaming vprintk_func to vprintk (adding > the asmlinkage annotation), and removing the vprintk definition from > printk.c. That way, printk

[PATCH] printk: rename vprintk_func to vprintk

2021-03-23 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
The printk code is already hard enough to understand. Remove an unnecessary indirection by renaming vprintk_func to vprintk (adding the asmlinkage annotation), and removing the vprintk definition from printk.c. That way, printk is implemented in terms of vprintk as one would expect, and there's no