Re: [PATCH] printk_ratelimit functions should use CONFIG_PRINTK

2007-12-14 Thread Joe Perches
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 13:12 -0600, Matt Mackall wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:00:35AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > Makes an embedded image a bit smaller > > Looks good to me. This should probably go to Andrew first though. And > it wouldn't hurt to see some size(1) results. For instance:

Re: [PATCH] printk_ratelimit functions should use CONFIG_PRINTK

2007-12-14 Thread Matt Mackall
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:00:35AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > Makes an embedded image a bit smaller Looks good to me. This should probably go to Andrew first though. And it wouldn't hurt to see some size(1) results. Acked-by: Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches

[PATCH] printk_ratelimit functions should use CONFIG_PRINTK

2007-12-14 Thread Joe Perches
Makes an embedded image a bit smaller Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/linux/kernel.h | 20 +++- kernel/printk.c|2 ++ kernel/sysctl.c| 20 ++-- 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH] printk_ratelimit functions should use CONFIG_PRINTK

2007-12-14 Thread Joe Perches
Makes an embedded image a bit smaller Signed-off-by: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/linux/kernel.h | 20 +++- kernel/printk.c|2 ++ kernel/sysctl.c| 20 ++-- 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH] printk_ratelimit functions should use CONFIG_PRINTK

2007-12-14 Thread Matt Mackall
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:00:35AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: Makes an embedded image a bit smaller Looks good to me. This should probably go to Andrew first though. And it wouldn't hurt to see some size(1) results. Acked-by: Matt Mackall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Joe Perches [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] printk_ratelimit functions should use CONFIG_PRINTK

2007-12-14 Thread Joe Perches
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 13:12 -0600, Matt Mackall wrote: On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:00:35AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: Makes an embedded image a bit smaller Looks good to me. This should probably go to Andrew first though. And it wouldn't hurt to see some size(1) results. For instance: x86