On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Richard Genoud
wrote:
> This is not triggered on glibc (as getdents is called with a 32KB
> buffer), but on uclibc, the buffer size is only 1KB, thus some proc
> entries are missing.
JFYI, on glibc 2.3.6.ds1-13 it's also 1 KiB.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Richard Genoud
richard.gen...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not triggered on glibc (as getdents is called with a 32KB
buffer), but on uclibc, the buffer size is only 1KB, thus some proc
entries are missing.
JFYI, on glibc 2.3.6.ds1-13 it's also 1 KiB.
2013/8/20 Marc Dionne :
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Marc Dionne wrote:
>>>
>>> By my reading that commit (f0c3b5093add) also made proc_readdir always
>>> return 0, so with this patch the effect I see is that no pid entries
>>>
2013/8/20 Marc Dionne marc.c.dio...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Marc Dionne marc.c.dio...@gmail.com wrote:
By my reading that commit (f0c3b5093add) also made proc_readdir always
return 0, so
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Marc Dionne wrote:
>>
>> By my reading that commit (f0c3b5093add) also made proc_readdir always
>> return 0, so with this patch the effect I see is that no pid entries
>> are listed under /proc, breaking ps
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Marc Dionne wrote:
>
> By my reading that commit (f0c3b5093add) also made proc_readdir always
> return 0, so with this patch the effect I see is that no pid entries
> are listed under /proc, breaking ps for instance. I don't see how
> even the previous version of
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Richard Genoud
wrote:
>
> commit f0c3b5093addc8bfe9fe3a5b01acb7ec7969eafa
> "[readdir] convert procfs" introduced a bug on the listing of the proc
> file-system.
> The return value of proc_readdir() isn't tested anymore in the
> proc_root_readdir function.
>
>
Thanks, applied.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
commit f0c3b5093addc8bfe9fe3a5b01acb7ec7969eafa
"[readdir] convert procfs" introduced a bug on the listing of the proc
file-system.
The return value of proc_readdir() isn't tested anymore in the
proc_root_readdir function.
This lead to an "interesting" behaviour when we are using the getdents()
commit f0c3b5093addc8bfe9fe3a5b01acb7ec7969eafa
[readdir] convert procfs introduced a bug on the listing of the proc
file-system.
The return value of proc_readdir() isn't tested anymore in the
proc_root_readdir function.
This lead to an interesting behaviour when we are using the getdents()
Thanks, applied.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Richard Genoud
richard.gen...@gmail.com wrote:
commit f0c3b5093addc8bfe9fe3a5b01acb7ec7969eafa
[readdir] convert procfs introduced a bug on the listing of the proc
file-system.
The return value of proc_readdir() isn't tested anymore in the
proc_root_readdir
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Marc Dionne marc.c.dio...@gmail.com wrote:
By my reading that commit (f0c3b5093add) also made proc_readdir always
return 0, so with this patch the effect I see is that no pid entries
are listed under /proc, breaking ps for instance. I don't see how
even the
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Marc Dionne marc.c.dio...@gmail.com wrote:
By my reading that commit (f0c3b5093add) also made proc_readdir always
return 0, so with this patch the effect I see is that no pid
14 matches
Mail list logo
