.kernel.org;
> Anton Vorontsov <an...@enomsg.org>; Colin Cross <ccr...@android.com>;
> Luck, Tony <tony.l...@intel.com>; Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pstore: Solve lockdep warning by moving inode locks
>
> On Fri, Apr 28
uck, Tony ; Namhyung Kim
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pstore: Solve lockdep warning by moving inode locks
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Lofstedt, Marta
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk]
>
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Anton Vorontsov <an...@enomsg.org>;
>> Colin Cross <ccr...@android.com>; Luck, Tony <tony.l...@intel.com>;
>> Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com>; Namhyung Kim
>> <namhy...@kernel.org>
>> Subjec
ontsov ;
>> Colin Cross ; Luck, Tony ;
>> Lofstedt, Marta ; Namhyung Kim
>>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pstore: Solve lockdep warning by moving inode locks
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 04:20:37PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> > Lockdep complains about a possible dea
@android.com>; Luck, Tony <tony.l...@intel.com>;
> Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofst...@intel.com>; Namhyung Kim
> <namhy...@kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pstore: Solve lockdep warning by moving inode locks
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 04:20:37PM -0700, Kees Cook
: Re: [PATCH] pstore: Solve lockdep warning by moving inode locks
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 04:20:37PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Lockdep complains about a possible deadlock between mount and unlink
> > (which is technically impossible), but fixing this improves possible
&
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 04:20:37PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Lockdep complains about a possible deadlock between mount and unlink
> (which is technically impossible), but fixing this improves possible
> future multiple-backend support, and keeps locking in the right order.
I have merged your
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 04:20:37PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> Lockdep complains about a possible deadlock between mount and unlink
> (which is technically impossible), but fixing this improves possible
> future multiple-backend support, and keeps locking in the right order.
I have merged your
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> Lockdep complains about a possible deadlock between mount and unlink
> (which is technically impossible), but fixing this improves possible
> future multiple-backend support, and keeps locking in the right order.
>
>
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> Lockdep complains about a possible deadlock between mount and unlink
> (which is technically impossible), but fixing this improves possible
> future multiple-backend support, and keeps locking in the right order.
>
> The lockdep warning
Lockdep complains about a possible deadlock between mount and unlink
(which is technically impossible), but fixing this improves possible
future multiple-backend support, and keeps locking in the right order.
The lockdep warning could be triggered by unlinking a file in the
pstore filesystem:
Lockdep complains about a possible deadlock between mount and unlink
(which is technically impossible), but fixing this improves possible
future multiple-backend support, and keeps locking in the right order.
The lockdep warning could be triggered by unlinking a file in the
pstore filesystem:
12 matches
Mail list logo