On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:33:13AM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 09:59 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 05:05:18PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> >> Hi Thierry,
> >>
> >> On 12 June 2013 16:59, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >>> Some drivers don't set the .owner
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:33:13AM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 06/12/2013 09:59 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 05:05:18PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:
Hi Thierry,
On 12 June 2013 16:59, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
Some drivers don't set the
On 06/12/2013 09:59 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 05:05:18PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>> Hi Thierry,
>>
>> On 12 June 2013 16:59, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> Some drivers don't set the .owner fields of the struct device_driver or
>>> struct pwm_ops, which causes the module
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 09:59:18PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 05:05:18PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> > Hi Thierry,
> >
> > On 12 June 2013 16:59, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > Some drivers don't set the .owner fields of the struct device_driver or
> > > struct pwm_ops,
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 05:05:18PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> On 12 June 2013 16:59, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > Some drivers don't set the .owner fields of the struct device_driver or
> > struct pwm_ops, which causes the module usage count to become wrong.
>
>
> Recently a
Hi Thierry,
On 12 June 2013 16:59, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Some drivers don't set the .owner fields of the struct device_driver or
> struct pwm_ops, which causes the module usage count to become wrong.
Recently a patch [1] was added to solve this issue of missing .owner
fileds in struct
Some drivers don't set the .owner fields of the struct device_driver or
struct pwm_ops, which causes the module usage count to become wrong.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c | 1 +
drivers/pwm/pwm-bfin.c | 1 +
drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 1 +
Some drivers don't set the .owner fields of the struct device_driver or
struct pwm_ops, which causes the module usage count to become wrong.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-atmel-tcb.c | 1 +
drivers/pwm/pwm-bfin.c | 1 +
drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
Hi Thierry,
On 12 June 2013 16:59, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
Some drivers don't set the .owner fields of the struct device_driver or
struct pwm_ops, which causes the module usage count to become wrong.
Recently a patch [1] was added to solve this issue of missing .owner
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 05:05:18PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:
Hi Thierry,
On 12 June 2013 16:59, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
Some drivers don't set the .owner fields of the struct device_driver or
struct pwm_ops, which causes the module usage count to become wrong.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 09:59:18PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 05:05:18PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:
Hi Thierry,
On 12 June 2013 16:59, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
Some drivers don't set the .owner fields of the struct device_driver or
On 06/12/2013 09:59 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 05:05:18PM +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:
Hi Thierry,
On 12 June 2013 16:59, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote:
Some drivers don't set the .owner fields of the struct device_driver or
struct pwm_ops, which causes
12 matches
Mail list logo