> Is there a list of cards this adds support for? I'm waiting on support
> for the X1600
This is not supported, neither by radeonfb (patches or not) nor by
X.org. X1xxx cards have a new display engine and ATI refuses to provide
any specs for it.
Note: I wonder how much of that is related to
chy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] radeonfb: add support for newer cards
>
> On 1/2/07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 22:44 +0100, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
el.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] radeonfb: add support for newer cards
>
> On 1/2/07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 22:44 +0100, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> > > Il Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 10:25:51PM +0100, Luc
] radeonfb: add support for newer cards
On 1/2/07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 22:44 +0100, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
Il Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 10:25:51PM +0100, Luca Tettamanti ha scritto:
Hi Ben, Andrew,
I've rebased 'ATOM BIOS patch' from Solomon
@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] radeonfb: add support for newer cards
On 1/2/07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 22:44 +0100, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
Il Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 10:25:51PM +0100, Luca Tettamanti ha scritto:
Hi Ben, Andrew
Is there a list of cards this adds support for? I'm waiting on support
for the X1600
This is not supported, neither by radeonfb (patches or not) nor by
X.org. X1xxx cards have a new display engine and ATI refuses to provide
any specs for it.
Note: I wonder how much of that is related to M$
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 10:44:42PM +0100, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> And - for an easier review - this is the diff between
> radeonfb-atom-2.6.19-v6a.diff from Solomon and my patch (whitespace-only
> changes not included).
It looks good in this quick once-over..
Thanks for the rebase!
Acked-by:
On 1/2/07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 22:44 +0100, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> Il Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 10:25:51PM +0100, Luca Tettamanti ha scritto:
> > Hi Ben, Andrew,
> > I've rebased 'ATOM BIOS patch' from Solomon Peachy to apply to 2.6.20.
> > The
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 22:44 +0100, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> Il Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 10:25:51PM +0100, Luca Tettamanti ha scritto:
> > Hi Ben, Andrew,
> > I've rebased 'ATOM BIOS patch' from Solomon Peachy to apply to 2.6.20.
> > The patch adds support for newer Radeon cards and is mainly based on
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 22:25 +0100, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> Hi Ben, Andrew,
> I've rebased 'ATOM BIOS patch' from Solomon Peachy to apply to 2.6.20.
> The patch adds support for newer Radeon cards and is mainly based on
> X.Org code.
>
> I've fixed a few things:
> - Port sharing in
Il Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 10:25:51PM +0100, Luca Tettamanti ha scritto:
> Hi Ben, Andrew,
> I've rebased 'ATOM BIOS patch' from Solomon Peachy to apply to 2.6.20.
> The patch adds support for newer Radeon cards and is mainly based on
> X.Org code.
And - for an easier review - this is the diff
Il Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 10:25:51PM +0100, Luca Tettamanti ha scritto:
Hi Ben, Andrew,
I've rebased 'ATOM BIOS patch' from Solomon Peachy to apply to 2.6.20.
The patch adds support for newer Radeon cards and is mainly based on
X.Org code.
And - for an easier review - this is the diff between
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 22:25 +0100, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
Hi Ben, Andrew,
I've rebased 'ATOM BIOS patch' from Solomon Peachy to apply to 2.6.20.
The patch adds support for newer Radeon cards and is mainly based on
X.Org code.
I've fixed a few things:
- Port sharing in
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 22:44 +0100, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
Il Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 10:25:51PM +0100, Luca Tettamanti ha scritto:
Hi Ben, Andrew,
I've rebased 'ATOM BIOS patch' from Solomon Peachy to apply to 2.6.20.
The patch adds support for newer Radeon cards and is mainly based on
On 1/2/07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 22:44 +0100, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
Il Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 10:25:51PM +0100, Luca Tettamanti ha scritto:
Hi Ben, Andrew,
I've rebased 'ATOM BIOS patch' from Solomon Peachy to apply to 2.6.20.
The patch adds
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 10:44:42PM +0100, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
And - for an easier review - this is the diff between
radeonfb-atom-2.6.19-v6a.diff from Solomon and my patch (whitespace-only
changes not included).
It looks good in this quick once-over..
Thanks for the rebase!
Acked-by:
16 matches
Mail list logo