On 2015/3/31 0:31, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Wang Long [150327 02:43]:
>> If we set ramoops.mem_type=1 in command line, the current
>> code can not change mem_type to 1, because it is assigned
>> to 0 in function ramoops_register_dummy.
>>
>> This patch make it possible to change mem_type
* Wang Long [150327 02:43]:
> If we set ramoops.mem_type=1 in command line, the current
> code can not change mem_type to 1, because it is assigned
> to 0 in function ramoops_register_dummy.
>
> This patch make it possible to change mem_type parameter
> in command line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang
* Wang Long long.wangl...@huawei.com [150327 02:43]:
If we set ramoops.mem_type=1 in command line, the current
code can not change mem_type to 1, because it is assigned
to 0 in function ramoops_register_dummy.
This patch make it possible to change mem_type parameter
in command line.
On 2015/3/31 0:31, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Wang Long long.wangl...@huawei.com [150327 02:43]:
If we set ramoops.mem_type=1 in command line, the current
code can not change mem_type to 1, because it is assigned
to 0 in function ramoops_register_dummy.
This patch make it possible to change
If we set ramoops.mem_type=1 in command line, the current
code can not change mem_type to 1, because it is assigned
to 0 in function ramoops_register_dummy.
This patch make it possible to change mem_type parameter
in command line.
Signed-off-by: Wang Long
---
fs/pstore/ram.c | 4 ++--
1 file
If we set ramoops.mem_type=1 in command line, the current
code can not change mem_type to 1, because it is assigned
to 0 in function ramoops_register_dummy.
This patch make it possible to change mem_type parameter
in command line.
Signed-off-by: Wang Long long.wangl...@huawei.com
---
6 matches
Mail list logo