On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:53:19PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> The way the mask is generated in regmap_field_init() is wrong.
> Indeed, a field initialized with msb = 31 and lsb = 0 provokes a shift
> overflow while calculating the mask field.
Applied, thanks.
signature.asc
Description: Digi
The way the mask is generated in regmap_field_init() is wrong.
Indeed, a field initialized with msb = 31 and lsb = 0 provokes a shift
overflow while calculating the mask field.
On some 32 bits architectures, such as x86, the generated mask is 0,
instead of the expected 0x.
This patch uses
2 matches
Mail list logo
