On 10/11/2013 05:33 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> On Friday 11 October 2013 03:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> Since regulator-boot-on property maps back to constraints->boot_on,
>> current description of 'regulator-boot-on' property conflicts with
>> description of 'boot-on' in
On Friday 11 October 2013 03:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Since regulator-boot-on property maps back to constraints->boot_on,
> current description of 'regulator-boot-on' property conflicts with
> description of 'boot-on' in include/linux/regulator/machine.h and the
> corresponding
Since regulator-boot-on property maps back to constraints->boot_on,
current description of 'regulator-boot-on' property conflicts with
description of 'boot-on' in include/linux/regulator/machine.h and the
corresponding implementation in drivers/regulator/core.c.
Ensure the description is more
On 10/11/2013 05:33 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Friday 11 October 2013 03:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Since regulator-boot-on property maps back to constraints-boot_on,
current description of 'regulator-boot-on' property conflicts with
description of 'boot-on' in
Since regulator-boot-on property maps back to constraints-boot_on,
current description of 'regulator-boot-on' property conflicts with
description of 'boot-on' in include/linux/regulator/machine.h and the
corresponding implementation in drivers/regulator/core.c.
Ensure the description is more
On Friday 11 October 2013 03:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
Since regulator-boot-on property maps back to constraints-boot_on,
current description of 'regulator-boot-on' property conflicts with
description of 'boot-on' in include/linux/regulator/machine.h and the
corresponding implementation in
6 matches
Mail list logo
