Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007 14:06:19 -0400
Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:46:30PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
otoh, the intersection between pages which are PageBooked() and pages which
are PageLazyFree() should be zreo, so it'd be good to
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007 14:06:19 -0400
Theodore Tso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:46:30PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
otoh, the intersection between pages which are PageBooked() and pages which
are PageLazyFree() should be zreo, so it'd be good to
On Mon, 14 May 2007 14:06:19 -0400
Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:46:30PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > otoh, the intersection between pages which are PageBooked() and pages which
> > are PageLazyFree() should be zreo, so it'd be good to actually formalise
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:46:30PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> otoh, the intersection between pages which are PageBooked() and pages which
> are PageLazyFree() should be zreo, so it'd be good to actually formalise
> this reuse within the ext4 patches.
>
> otoh2, PageLazyFree() could have reused
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:46:30PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 14 May 2007 10:37:18 +0800 Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > PG_lazyfree and PG_booked shares the same bit.
> >
> > Either it is a bug that shall fixed by the following patch, or
> > the situation should be
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:46:30PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007 10:37:18 +0800 Fengguang Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PG_lazyfree and PG_booked shares the same bit.
Either it is a bug that shall fixed by the following patch, or
the situation should be explicitly
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:46:30PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
otoh, the intersection between pages which are PageBooked() and pages which
are PageLazyFree() should be zreo, so it'd be good to actually formalise
this reuse within the ext4 patches.
otoh2, PageLazyFree() could have reused
On Mon, 14 May 2007 14:06:19 -0400
Theodore Tso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:46:30PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
otoh, the intersection between pages which are PageBooked() and pages which
are PageLazyFree() should be zreo, so it'd be good to actually formalise
this
On Mon, 14 May 2007 10:37:18 +0800 Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PG_lazyfree and PG_booked shares the same bit.
>
> Either it is a bug that shall fixed by the following patch, or
> the situation should be explicitly documented?
>
> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
PG_lazyfree and PG_booked shares the same bit.
Either it is a bug that shall fixed by the following patch, or
the situation should be explicitly documented?
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/linux/page-flags.h |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
PG_lazyfree and PG_booked shares the same bit.
Either it is a bug that shall fixed by the following patch, or
the situation should be explicitly documented?
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/linux/page-flags.h |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
On Mon, 14 May 2007 10:37:18 +0800 Fengguang Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PG_lazyfree and PG_booked shares the same bit.
Either it is a bug that shall fixed by the following patch, or
the situation should be explicitly documented?
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
12 matches
Mail list logo