Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Only update pages_touched when a new page is touched

On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 08:44:00 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > Looks good to me. > > Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) Thanks. > > BTW, isn't this a real bugfix, because the page_touched can be > bigger than nr_pages without this fix? Yes, I simply forgot to add the Cc stable. --

Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer: Only update pages_touched when a new page is touched

On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 15:13:09 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" > > The "buffer_percent" logic that is used by the ring buffer splice code to > only wake up the tasks when there's no data after the buffer is filled to > the percentage of the "buffer_percent" file is

[PATCH] ring-buffer: Only update pages_touched when a new page is touched

From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" The "buffer_percent" logic that is used by the ring buffer splice code to only wake up the tasks when there's no data after the buffer is filled to the percentage of the "buffer_percent" file is dependent on three variables that determine the amount of data that