On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 06:00:35PM -0800, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:07:38 PST (-0800), guo...@kernel.org wrote:
> >Hi Christoph,
> >
> >I use PFN_DOWN() every where as possible and seems it's a habit
> >problem. So let risc-v maintainer to choose "PFN_DOW()" or
> >">>
On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:07:38 PST (-0800), guo...@kernel.org wrote:
Hi Christoph,
I use PFN_DOWN() every where as possible and seems it's a habit
problem. So let risc-v maintainer to choose "PFN_DOW()" or
">> PAGE_SHIFT".
Also the same with "end_of_DRAM & max_low_pfn".
PFN_DOWN makes sense to
Hi Christoph,
I use PFN_DOWN() every where as possible and seems it's a habit
problem. So let risc-v maintainer to choose "PFN_DOW()" or
">> PAGE_SHIFT".
Also the same with "end_of_DRAM & max_low_pfn".
Best Regards
Guo Ren
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 08:12:54AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:10:00AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> > > set_max_mapnr(PFN_DOWN(mem_size));
> > > - max_low_pfn = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
> > > + max_low_pfn = PFN_DOWN(memblock_end_of_DRAM());
> >
> > I know it is used just above, but can we please just switch this
> > code to use >>
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 07:36:13AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 04:16:27PM +0800, guo...@kernel.org wrote:
> > From: Guo Ren
> >
> > max_low_pfn should be pfn_size not byte_size.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren
> > Signed-off-by: Mao Han
> > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt
> >
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 04:16:27PM +0800, guo...@kernel.org wrote:
> From: Guo Ren
>
> max_low_pfn should be pfn_size not byte_size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren
> Signed-off-by: Mao Han
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt
> Cc: Albert Ou
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 2 +-
> arch/riscv/mm/init.c
From: Guo Ren
max_low_pfn should be pfn_size not byte_size.
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren
Signed-off-by: Mao Han
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt
Cc: Albert Ou
---
arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 2 +-
arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
7 matches
Mail list logo