On 3/14/21 7:52 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Tyrel Datwyler writes:
>> On 3/13/21 1:17 AM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 04:30:21PM -0600, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
Both add_slot_store() and remove_slot_store() try to fix up the drc_name
copied from the store buffer by
Tyrel Datwyler writes:
> On 3/13/21 1:17 AM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 04:30:21PM -0600, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
>>> Both add_slot_store() and remove_slot_store() try to fix up the drc_name
>>> copied from the store buffer by placing a NULL terminator at nbyte + 1
>>> or in p
On 3/13/21 1:17 AM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 04:30:21PM -0600, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
>> Both add_slot_store() and remove_slot_store() try to fix up the drc_name
>> copied from the store buffer by placing a NULL terminator at nbyte + 1
>> or in place of a '\n' if present. How
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 04:30:21PM -0600, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
> Both add_slot_store() and remove_slot_store() try to fix up the drc_name
> copied from the store buffer by placing a NULL terminator at nbyte + 1
> or in place of a '\n' if present. However, the static buffer that we
> copy the drc_n
Both add_slot_store() and remove_slot_store() try to fix up the drc_name
copied from the store buffer by placing a NULL terminator at nbyte + 1
or in place of a '\n' if present. However, the static buffer that we
copy the drc_name data into is not zeored and can contain anything past
the n-th byte.
5 matches
Mail list logo
