On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 02:20:17PM -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> On 13-03-28 05:57 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 05:09:59PM -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> >> On 13-03-26 03:27 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 06:37:12PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 05:16:00PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 10:57 AM, Johan Hovold :
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 05:09:59PM -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> >> On 13-03-26 03:27 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 06:37:12PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
[...]
>
On 03/28/2013 07:20 PM, Douglas Gilbert :
> On 13-03-28 05:57 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 05:09:59PM -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>>> On 13-03-26 03:27 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 06:37:12PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On some revisions of
On 03/28/2013 07:20 PM, Douglas Gilbert :
On 13-03-28 05:57 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 05:09:59PM -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
On 13-03-26 03:27 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 06:37:12PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 05:16:00PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
On 03/28/2013 10:57 AM, Johan Hovold :
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 05:09:59PM -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
On 13-03-26 03:27 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 06:37:12PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
[...]
@@ -198,9
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 02:20:17PM -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
On 13-03-28 05:57 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 05:09:59PM -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
On 13-03-26 03:27 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 06:37:12PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
On some
On 13-03-28 05:57 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 05:09:59PM -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
On 13-03-26 03:27 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 06:37:12PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC IMR register is not working.
Instead of
On 03/28/2013 10:57 AM, Johan Hovold :
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 05:09:59PM -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
>> On 13-03-26 03:27 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 06:37:12PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC IMR register is not working.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 05:09:59PM -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> On 13-03-26 03:27 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 06:37:12PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> >> On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC IMR register is not working.
> >> Instead of elaborating a workaround for
On 13-03-28 05:57 AM, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 05:09:59PM -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
On 13-03-26 03:27 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 06:37:12PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC IMR register is not working.
Instead of
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 05:09:59PM -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
On 13-03-26 03:27 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 06:37:12PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC IMR register is not working.
Instead of elaborating a workaround for that
On 03/28/2013 10:57 AM, Johan Hovold :
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 05:09:59PM -0400, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
On 13-03-26 03:27 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 06:37:12PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC IMR register is not working.
Instead of
On 13-03-26 03:27 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 06:37:12PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC IMR register is not working.
Instead of elaborating a workaround for that specific SoC or IP version,
we simply use a software variable to store the
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 06:37:12PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC IMR register is not working.
> Instead of elaborating a workaround for that specific SoC or IP version,
> we simply use a software variable to store the Interrupt Mask Register and
> modify it
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 06:37:12PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC IMR register is not working.
Instead of elaborating a workaround for that specific SoC or IP version,
we simply use a software variable to store the Interrupt Mask Register and
modify it for
On 13-03-26 03:27 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 06:37:12PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC IMR register is not working.
Instead of elaborating a workaround for that specific SoC or IP version,
we simply use a software variable to store the
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:15:23 -0400 Douglas Gilbert
wrote:
> On 13-03-20 05:50 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:37:12 +0100 Nicolas Ferre
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC IMR register is not working.
> >> Instead of elaborating a workaround for
On 03/20/2013 10:50 PM, Andrew Morton :
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:37:12 +0100 Nicolas Ferre
> wrote:
>
>> On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC IMR register is not working.
>> Instead of elaborating a workaround for that specific SoC or IP version,
>> we simply use a software variable to store
On 03/20/2013 10:50 PM, Andrew Morton :
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:37:12 +0100 Nicolas Ferre nicolas.fe...@atmel.com
wrote:
On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC IMR register is not working.
Instead of elaborating a workaround for that specific SoC or IP version,
we simply use a software
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 21:15:23 -0400 Douglas Gilbert dgilb...@interlog.com
wrote:
On 13-03-20 05:50 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:37:12 +0100 Nicolas Ferre nicolas.fe...@atmel.com
wrote:
On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC IMR register is not working.
Instead of
On 13-03-20 05:50 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:37:12 +0100 Nicolas Ferre
wrote:
On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC IMR register is not working.
Instead of elaborating a workaround for that specific SoC or IP version,
we simply use a software variable to store the
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:37:12 +0100 Nicolas Ferre
wrote:
> On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC IMR register is not working.
> Instead of elaborating a workaround for that specific SoC or IP version,
> we simply use a software variable to store the Interrupt Mask Register and
> modify it for
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:37:12 +0100 Nicolas Ferre nicolas.fe...@atmel.com
wrote:
On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC IMR register is not working.
Instead of elaborating a workaround for that specific SoC or IP version,
we simply use a software variable to store the Interrupt Mask Register
On 13-03-20 05:50 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:37:12 +0100 Nicolas Ferre nicolas.fe...@atmel.com
wrote:
On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC IMR register is not working.
Instead of elaborating a workaround for that specific SoC or IP version,
we simply use a software
On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC IMR register is not working.
Instead of elaborating a workaround for that specific SoC or IP version,
we simply use a software variable to store the Interrupt Mask Register and
modify it for each enabling/disabling of an interrupt. The overhead of this
is
On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC IMR register is not working.
Instead of elaborating a workaround for that specific SoC or IP version,
we simply use a software variable to store the Interrupt Mask Register and
modify it for each enabling/disabling of an interrupt. The overhead of this
is
26 matches
Mail list logo