Re: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: Fix for agressive power saving by rtl8723bu wireless IC

John Heenan writes: > Barry Day has submitted real world reports for the 8192eu and 8192cu. > This needs to be acknowledged. I have submitted real world reports for > the 8723bu. Lets get this a little more clear - first of all, I have asked you to investigate which part resolves

Re: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: Fix for agressive power saving by rtl8723bu wireless IC

John Heenan writes: > Barry Day has submitted real world reports for the 8192eu and 8192cu. > This needs to be acknowledged. I have submitted real world reports for > the 8723bu. Lets get this a little more clear - first of all, I have asked you to investigate which part resolves the problem.

Re: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: Fix for agressive power saving by rtl8723bu wireless IC

Barry Day has submitted real world reports for the 8192eu and 8192cu. This needs to be acknowledged. I have submitted real world reports for the 8723bu. When it comes down to it, it looks like the kernel code changes are really going to be very trivial to fix this problem and we need to take the

Re: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: Fix for agressive power saving by rtl8723bu wireless IC

Barry Day has submitted real world reports for the 8192eu and 8192cu. This needs to be acknowledged. I have submitted real world reports for the 8723bu. When it comes down to it, it looks like the kernel code changes are really going to be very trivial to fix this problem and we need to take the

Re: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: Fix for agressive power saving by rtl8723bu wireless IC

I have a prepared another patch that is not USB VID/PID dependent for rtl8723bu devices. It is more elegant. I will send it after this email. If I have more patches is it preferable I just put them on github only and notify a link address until there might be some resolution? What I meant below

Re: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: Fix for agressive power saving by rtl8723bu wireless IC

I have a prepared another patch that is not USB VID/PID dependent for rtl8723bu devices. It is more elegant. I will send it after this email. If I have more patches is it preferable I just put them on github only and notify a link address until there might be some resolution? What I meant below

Re: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: Fix for agressive power saving by rtl8723bu wireless IC

On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 08:15 +1000, John Heenan wrote: > > On 1 November 2016 at 07:25, Jes Sorensen wrote: > > > > John Heenan writes: > > > The rtl8723bu wireless IC shows evidence of a more agressive approach to > > > power saving, powering down its RF

Re: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: Fix for agressive power saving by rtl8723bu wireless IC

On Tue, 2016-11-01 at 08:15 +1000, John Heenan wrote: > > On 1 November 2016 at 07:25, Jes Sorensen wrote: > > > > John Heenan writes: > > > The rtl8723bu wireless IC shows evidence of a more agressive approach to > > > power saving, powering down its RF side when there is no wireless > > >

Re: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: Fix for agressive power saving by rtl8723bu wireless IC

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 05:25:12PM -0400, Jes Sorensen wrote: > As mentioned previously, if this is to be changed here, it has to be > matched in the _stop section too. It also has to be investigated exactly > why this matters for 8723bu. It is possible this matters for other > devices, but we

Re: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: Fix for agressive power saving by rtl8723bu wireless IC

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 05:25:12PM -0400, Jes Sorensen wrote: > As mentioned previously, if this is to be changed here, it has to be > matched in the _stop section too. It also has to be investigated exactly > why this matters for 8723bu. It is possible this matters for other > devices, but we

Re: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: Fix for agressive power saving by rtl8723bu wireless IC

On 1 November 2016 at 07:25, Jes Sorensen wrote: > John Heenan writes: >> The rtl8723bu wireless IC shows evidence of a more agressive approach to >> power saving, powering down its RF side when there is no wireless >> interfacing but leaving USB

Re: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: Fix for agressive power saving by rtl8723bu wireless IC

On 1 November 2016 at 07:25, Jes Sorensen wrote: > John Heenan writes: >> The rtl8723bu wireless IC shows evidence of a more agressive approach to >> power saving, powering down its RF side when there is no wireless >> interfacing but leaving USB interfacing intact. This makes the wireless >> IC

Re: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: Fix for agressive power saving by rtl8723bu wireless IC

John Heenan writes: > The rtl8723bu wireless IC shows evidence of a more agressive approach to > power saving, powering down its RF side when there is no wireless > interfacing but leaving USB interfacing intact. This makes the wireless > IC more suitable for use in devices which

Re: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: Fix for agressive power saving by rtl8723bu wireless IC

John Heenan writes: > The rtl8723bu wireless IC shows evidence of a more agressive approach to > power saving, powering down its RF side when there is no wireless > interfacing but leaving USB interfacing intact. This makes the wireless > IC more suitable for use in devices which need to keep

[PATCH] rtl8xxxu: Fix for agressive power saving by rtl8723bu wireless IC

The rtl8723bu wireless IC shows evidence of a more agressive approach to power saving, powering down its RF side when there is no wireless interfacing but leaving USB interfacing intact. This makes the wireless IC more suitable for use in devices which need to keep their power use as low as

[PATCH] rtl8xxxu: Fix for agressive power saving by rtl8723bu wireless IC

The rtl8723bu wireless IC shows evidence of a more agressive approach to power saving, powering down its RF side when there is no wireless interfacing but leaving USB interfacing intact. This makes the wireless IC more suitable for use in devices which need to keep their power use as low as