* Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 16:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > i'm not excluding that this will become necessary in the future. We
> > should also add the safety check to sched.h - all i'm suggesting is to
> > not make it a .config option just now,
The subject should be "[PATCH] safety check of MAX_RT_PRIO >=
MAX_USER_RT_PRIO". Ever since I've upgraded my debian unstable, I've
lost my spell checking!
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 16:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i'm not excluding that this will become necessary in the future. We
> should also add the safety check to sched.h - all i'm suggesting is to
> not make it a .config option just now, because that tends to be fiddled
> with.
So Ingo, would
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 16:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
i'm not excluding that this will become necessary in the future. We
should also add the safety check to sched.h - all i'm suggesting is to
not make it a .config option just now, because that tends to be fiddled
with.
So Ingo, would you
The subject should be [PATCH] safety check of MAX_RT_PRIO =
MAX_USER_RT_PRIO. Ever since I've upgraded my debian unstable, I've
lost my spell checking!
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
* Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 16:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
i'm not excluding that this will become necessary in the future. We
should also add the safety check to sched.h - all i'm suggesting is to
not make it a .config option just now, because that
6 matches
Mail list logo
