On Wed 2017-11-15 09:45:41, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 08:46:51AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> > Am 15.11.2017 07:29 schrieb Greg KH:
> > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:50:37AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> > > > A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong.
On Wed 2017-11-15 09:45:41, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 08:46:51AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> > Am 15.11.2017 07:29 schrieb Greg KH:
> > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:50:37AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> > > > A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong.
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 08:46:51AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> Am 15.11.2017 07:29 schrieb Greg KH:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:50:37AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> > > A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having
> > > this
> > > still in our source files
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 08:46:51AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> Am 15.11.2017 07:29 schrieb Greg KH:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:50:37AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> > > A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having
> > > this
> > > still in our source files
Am 15.11.2017 07:29 schrieb Greg KH:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:50:37AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having
this
still in our source files feels old and unmaintained.
Let's take the license statement serious and not confuse
Am 15.11.2017 07:29 schrieb Greg KH:
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:50:37AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having
this
still in our source files feels old and unmaintained.
Let's take the license statement serious and not confuse
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:50:37AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having this
> still in our source files feels old and unmaintained.
>
> Let's take the license statement serious and not confuse users.
>
> As
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:50:37AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having this
> still in our source files feels old and unmaintained.
>
> Let's take the license statement serious and not confuse users.
>
> As
A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having this
still in our source files feels old and unmaintained.
Let's take the license statement serious and not confuse users.
As https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html suggests, we replace the
postal address with
A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having this
still in our source files feels old and unmaintained.
Let's take the license statement serious and not confuse users.
As https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html suggests, we replace the
postal address with
10 matches
Mail list logo