Re: [PATCH] samples: replace FSF address with web source in license notices

2017-11-22 Thread Pavel Machek
On Wed 2017-11-15 09:45:41, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 08:46:51AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > > Am 15.11.2017 07:29 schrieb Greg KH: > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:50:37AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > > > > A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong.

Re: [PATCH] samples: replace FSF address with web source in license notices

2017-11-22 Thread Pavel Machek
On Wed 2017-11-15 09:45:41, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 08:46:51AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > > Am 15.11.2017 07:29 schrieb Greg KH: > > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:50:37AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > > > > A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong.

Re: [PATCH] samples: replace FSF address with web source in license notices

2017-11-15 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 08:46:51AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > Am 15.11.2017 07:29 schrieb Greg KH: > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:50:37AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > > > A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having > > > this > > > still in our source files

Re: [PATCH] samples: replace FSF address with web source in license notices

2017-11-15 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 08:46:51AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > Am 15.11.2017 07:29 schrieb Greg KH: > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:50:37AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > > > A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having > > > this > > > still in our source files

Re: [PATCH] samples: replace FSF address with web source in license notices

2017-11-14 Thread Martin Kepplinger
Am 15.11.2017 07:29 schrieb Greg KH: On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:50:37AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having this still in our source files feels old and unmaintained. Let's take the license statement serious and not confuse

Re: [PATCH] samples: replace FSF address with web source in license notices

2017-11-14 Thread Martin Kepplinger
Am 15.11.2017 07:29 schrieb Greg KH: On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:50:37AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having this still in our source files feels old and unmaintained. Let's take the license statement serious and not confuse

Re: [PATCH] samples: replace FSF address with web source in license notices

2017-11-14 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:50:37AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having this > still in our source files feels old and unmaintained. > > Let's take the license statement serious and not confuse users. > > As

Re: [PATCH] samples: replace FSF address with web source in license notices

2017-11-14 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:50:37AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having this > still in our source files feels old and unmaintained. > > Let's take the license statement serious and not confuse users. > > As

[PATCH] samples: replace FSF address with web source in license notices

2017-11-14 Thread Martin Kepplinger
A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having this still in our source files feels old and unmaintained. Let's take the license statement serious and not confuse users. As https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html suggests, we replace the postal address with

[PATCH] samples: replace FSF address with web source in license notices

2017-11-14 Thread Martin Kepplinger
A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having this still in our source files feels old and unmaintained. Let's take the license statement serious and not confuse users. As https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html suggests, we replace the postal address with